Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Drudge Breaking: PRESIDENT OBAMA TAKES ON RUSH LIMBAUGH IN NEW MEDIA WAR
Drudge Report ^ | 1-23-2009

Posted on 01/23/2009 5:22:49 PM PST by My Favorite Headache

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 441-445 next last
To: jonathonandjennifer

I was never this furious with Clinton.


221 posted on 01/23/2009 7:55:38 PM PST by gitmo (I am the latte-sipping, NYT-reading, Volvo-driving, no-gun-owning, effete, PC, arrogant liberal. -BO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: Bhoy
they don’t go along they will prosecute Bush?

I don't think that' it. I suppose it has more to do with poor republican leadership. We need a Newt and we got a McCain.

222 posted on 01/23/2009 7:59:17 PM PST by topfile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: Bhoy

When is the last time you remember the Republicans as a whole in Congress showing any courage or backbone????


223 posted on 01/23/2009 8:00:05 PM PST by My hearts in London - Everett (Remember the 3 Rs: Respect for self; Respect for others; and Responsibility for all your actions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: bray
Never pick a fight w/someone who buys his megawatts by the barrel.

An interesting comparison, but Rush doesn't buy his air time ... he's paid for it!

224 posted on 01/23/2009 8:04:03 PM PST by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: jonathonandjennifer
I don’t think Obama realizes he is dealing with true patriots here.

You're right. He doesn't. He thinks:

"You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, and like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. So it’s not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

He doesn't know it has nothing to do with race or xenophobia, or 'clinging' to anything other than the principles upon which this country was built. Principles that he knows little about and cares even less. He wants to reprinciple it in his own socialist principles. Which is why, Rush and us want him to fail in that effort. That's what he doesn't get. And the fact that 'he won' tends to reinforce his ideas of course. But the fact that this isn't a 'pure democracy' and _why_ it isn't is something he can't fathom or doesn't care to fathom.

225 posted on 01/23/2009 8:06:30 PM PST by Kent C
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: gitmo
I was never this furious with Clinton. Me neither, although I'm not exactly sure why.
226 posted on 01/23/2009 8:08:48 PM PST by jonathonandjennifer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: WildWeasel
Go for it Rush

I bet Rush is actually quite surprised that O'bummer has singled him out. In the eyes of O'bummer I suppose he sees Rush as his most alarming and vocal Critic.

Rush will be both honored and saddened at the same time.

227 posted on 01/23/2009 8:09:08 PM PST by topfile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Wil H

Exactly! It wasn’t Ayers and Wright that sought him out, it was the other way around. That one spot where he talks about ‘negative and positive rights’ and how the civil rights movement made a mistake by going through the courts, convinced me of that.


228 posted on 01/23/2009 8:09:52 PM PST by Kent C
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: chevydude26

I think PBRcat was referring to this article http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/30/us/politics/30law.html?_r=1&ref=politics&pagewanted=all

“The Chicago faculty is more rightward-leaning than that of other top law schools, but if teaching alongside some of the most formidable conservative minds in the country had any impact on Mr. Obama, no one can quite point to it.

“I don’t think anything that went on in these chambers affected him,” said Richard Epstein, a libertarian colleague who says he longed for Mr. Obama to venture beyond his ideological and topical comfort zones. “His entire life, as best I can tell, is one in which he’s always been a thoughtful listener and questioner, but he’s never stepped up to the plate and taken full swings.” “


229 posted on 01/23/2009 8:12:26 PM PST by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
I figured he needed his Blackberry

I understand he has ditched it and is now using a Dingleberry to communicate with is advisers.

230 posted on 01/23/2009 8:13:41 PM PST by topfile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
There may be big things that unify RINOs and Dems and unify Republicrats and Dems, but there are NO things, big or small, that unify true Republicans and Democrats. Not one single thing I can think of.

Congress is very responsive to the public mood, Rep or Dem. There is a hard core left among the Democrats in Congress, but if things keep going the way they look like they're going, a lot of Rats could go overboard. Look at how fast the press got slapped. Obama thinks it's all over because "he won."

"... it's just starting, now." - Firesign Theatre

231 posted on 01/23/2009 8:14:05 PM PST by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: MarineBrat
Rush vs. Obama = Victory for Rush (14 million daily listeners).

Obama has just lost a most major PR battle.
232 posted on 01/23/2009 8:16:00 PM PST by Falconspeed ("Keep your fears to yourself, but share your courage with others." Robert Louis Stevenson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BAW

I don’t listen to Rush, but I think I will on Monday to hear how he deals with this. If I can get him in my city, that is.


233 posted on 01/23/2009 8:16:56 PM PST by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: riri
Rush has to go into exile?

Surely you jest?

234 posted on 01/23/2009 8:17:06 PM PST by topfile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: topfile
I bet Rush is actually quite surprised that O'bummer has singled him out.

Rush is probably the least surprised. Obama prefaced this with his 'childish things' in his inaug. speech, which imo, was directed at Rush (and others perhaps - Hannity, et. al.) and I assume Rush got that too.

235 posted on 01/23/2009 8:18:05 PM PST by Kent C
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: TennTuxedo

Might be a good idea for Rush to make sure he has no more legal skeletons in his closet and that his taxes are in order... Because I fully expect Obama to go after him and other outspoken Conservative-type folks who are outspoken critics of THE ONE.


236 posted on 01/23/2009 8:20:35 PM PST by TheBattman (Pray for our country....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

“I think PBRcat was referring to this article http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/30/us/politics/30law.html?_r=1&ref=politics&pagewanted=all

“The Chicago faculty is more rightward-leaning than that of other top law schools, but if teaching alongside some of the most formidable conservative minds in the country had any impact on Mr. Obama, no one can quite point to it.

“I don’t think anything that went on in these chambers affected him,” said Richard Epstein, a libertarian colleague who says he longed for Mr. Obama to venture beyond his ideological and topical comfort zones. “His entire life, as best I can tell, is one in which he’s always been a thoughtful listener and questioner, but he’s never stepped up to the plate and taken full swings.” “

Thank you...I remember Rush talking about this


237 posted on 01/23/2009 8:20:53 PM PST by chevydude26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: everyone

I would love to know if any of you are posting your feelings to the WH’s website, you know, in the special “Love Letters to Our Arrogant Fraudident Obama” section.


238 posted on 01/23/2009 8:21:47 PM PST by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Kent C

I would love for Rush to run for president in 2012...

screw everybody else

this is who we need...

although i know he never will take the paycut and I don’t know if i would either if I made 50 million a year doing what rush does


239 posted on 01/23/2009 8:25:53 PM PST by chevydude26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Kent C
All Republican administrations have been able to do is cut taxes during their tenure, never rolling back any of the socialism with the possible exception of cutting back on welfare in '94 but my guess is the outlays now outstrip the outlays then.

Deregulation under Reagan was a huge boost to Free Enterprise. Look at the airlines, and above all, look at the demise of Ma Bell. What was it other than a state supported monopoly? A very fine example of one, to be sure, but a state supported monopoly, nevertheless.

240 posted on 01/23/2009 8:27:02 PM PST by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 441-445 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson