Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First Lady considers Sasha, Malia dolls 'inappropriate'
Chicago Business ^ | Jan. 22, 2009 | Meghan Streit

Posted on 01/23/2009 1:00:29 PM PST by cdchik123

(Crain’s) — First lady Michelle Obama is not pleased about the marketing of a pair of dolls that bear the same names as her daughters.

“We believe it is inappropriate to use young private citizens for marketing purposes,” Ms. Obama’s spokeswoman said.

Ty Inc. released its “Sweet Sasha” and “Marvelous Malia” dolls this month. Both dolls have bronze skin and dark hair.

The dolls are part of the Westmont-based toymaker’s TyGirlz line. The company is also the creator of Beanie Babies, which have reportedly generated more than $6 billion in sales since their debut in 1994.

You May Also Like

* Ty Inc. selling Sasha, Malia dolls

Suggested Searches

lady considers sasha - malia dolls - selling sasha

Sponsored by

Chicagobusiness.com reported Wednesday that “Sweet Sasha” and “Marvelous Malia” hit store shelves this month just before Barack Obama was inaugurated.

A Ty spokeswoman originally acknowledged to Crain’s that the Sasha and Malia dolls were created with the first daughters in mind. She has since backed away from that statement.

“They were not designed to look like any living person,” the spokeswoman said of the dolls on Thursday. “Somehow there was a misunderstanding.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dolls; obamadolls; obamafamily; toys
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: Recovering_Democrat

When are the girls old enough to go to war like they wanted the Bush twins to do?


41 posted on 01/23/2009 2:06:36 PM PST by italianquaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123

Sorry, Aunt Esther but after what your side did to Palin’s kids they are fair game.


42 posted on 01/23/2009 2:06:49 PM PST by DogBarkTree (Sometimes you have to let it go in order to get a Grip.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarheel

Mama Obama should have been as smart as the Democrats think she is and named her kids like Judy and Rose. Then there would be no problem. I don’t understand why A/A (african-american’s) pick such weird names for their kids. You can pick up any paper and determine their race when first names are printed without pictures in most cases


43 posted on 01/23/2009 2:08:55 PM PST by supermop (Somebody has to clean up the mess he will leave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: messierhunter

I agree. Look, those 2 dolls are just dolls. they do not resemble the O daughters.

this is part of the price of being President.. loss of privacy.

I would feel differently if these dolls were made to look disrespectful. but they are not..


44 posted on 01/23/2009 2:09:42 PM PST by Chuzzlewit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123
“We believe it is inappropriate to use young private citizens for marketing purposes,” Ms. Obama’s spokeswoman said.

Translation: We believe it's inappropriate for Ty to do this without giving us a cut...

45 posted on 01/23/2009 2:12:18 PM PST by COBOL2Java (Obamanation: an imploding administration headed by a clueless schmuck, with McCain as his Kowakian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chuzzlewit

You mean like the Bratz named Sasha?

46 posted on 01/23/2009 2:20:32 PM PST by DogBarkTree (Sometimes you have to let it go in order to get a Grip.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

Wait till she sees the Obama Chia Pet.


47 posted on 01/23/2009 2:22:33 PM PST by CobraJet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

I saw those flags, too. When did it become appropriate to plaster Obama’s face on the American flag?


48 posted on 01/23/2009 2:23:54 PM PST by New Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123

Then you should have copyrighted their names then. You know for a first lady you sure are as dumb as a brick.


49 posted on 01/23/2009 2:23:58 PM PST by CougarGA7 (Wisdom comes with age, but sometimes age comes alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FelixFelicis
Ah, yes. The arbitrary rule!

And what defines grossly calling attention to yourself? Having been pregnant? Being caught drinking in Austin?

Do you really think Chelsea didnt have any discretions, or is it more likely no one wanted to blemish the Clintons.

I think the rule should be, if you can bring your kids up in the spotlight, then anyone else can comment. Im so tired of our side acting like a bunch of eunuchs and pussy footing around hard issues.

50 posted on 01/23/2009 2:45:58 PM PST by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: FelixFelicis
Ah, yes. The arbitrary rule!

And what defines grossly calling attention to yourself? Having been pregnant? Being caught drinking in Austin?

Do you really think Chelsea didnt have any discretions, or is it more likely no one wanted to blemish the Clintons.

I think the rule should be, if you can bring your kids up in the spotlight, then anyone else can comment. Im so tired of our side acting like a bunch of eunuchs and pussy footing around hard issues.

51 posted on 01/23/2009 2:46:01 PM PST by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123

Madame Mao has spoken! So let it be written, so let it be done!


52 posted on 01/23/2009 3:39:12 PM PST by TexasRepublic (I am inconsolate over the death of our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam

It may be arbitrarily applied, but that doesn’t make it a bad rule. Personally, I’m all for pussyfooting around children. There are some hard issues out there, but this ain’t one of them.

And yeah, if you make a public spectacle of yourself by drinking yourself stupid, that’s grossly calling attention to yourself.


53 posted on 01/23/2009 3:46:02 PM PST by FelixFelicis (When can we *change* back? [Get yer bumper sticker at www.cafepress.com/deepright!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123

They aren’t private citizens anymore.


54 posted on 01/23/2009 3:59:30 PM PST by goldi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123

Obama’s liberal press ripped into Sarah’s children. Screw theirs. We lose by taking the high road when they are palying school-yard rules.


55 posted on 01/23/2009 5:11:16 PM PST by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123

So solly miz Obummer, youse li’l picka-ninnies is guvvermint property fo th’ nex fo yars. Dey izznt privit.


56 posted on 01/23/2009 5:15:11 PM PST by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FelixFelicis
The children are not the issue. The hypocrisy of the mom is. She and her husband used them in magazines and commercials to win an election, so they are no longer off limits. Sorry if that hurts your feelings.

And getting drunk in Austin doesnt make you a public spectacle, just an average college student. But believe what you gotta....

57 posted on 01/23/2009 11:33:39 PM PST by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson