Stop whining.http://boycottnyt.com/take-action
LOL ... it’s too late for a boycott. Look at their financial bottom line. No readers, no advertisers ... only the same ignorant gasbag journos and management.
Last year there 250,000 marchers. C-SPAN didn’t show it live. There was a Gay Pride event that same Saturday. Wall to Wall.
As if the NYTimes were the only thing ignoring the masses. Even if the American people read it in the Slimes, they wouldn’t care. The majority of the electorate voted for a pro-abort, remember? They are overjoyed that he is speeding up the death march - here and abroad.
Washington Times estimated crowd at 250,000+.
AP claimed “tens of thousands” and only “3 blocks” of marchers
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2169970/posts
There will be another March For Life next year and the year after that, and the year after that. Can the same be said for an edition of the Times? :)
This is a media tactic used more frequently since Reagan.
We all know Reagan bypassed the media and went straight to the people. This could not be allowed by our media.
Hence, they now ignore reporting events that do not support the liberal agenda.
President George W Bush gave many excellent speeches about the war on terror, why certain action were taken, etc, but the media did not report on those.
If you remember, the media even refused to cover President Bush’s address to the nation on TV at certain times.
Lastly, remember, the media has even taken conservatives out of context to destroy them.
This move, by the NY Times is nothing new and will continue to get worse over time.
Stop whining.Not only this, Barack actually had an encounter with some protesters and the audio played on Laura Ingraham’s program yesterday.
When you back out of the shot, you can see most of the crowd is photographers and reporters.
How easy is it to manufacture or suppress a story? Pretty damn easy.
The New York Times - and other liberal rags - need to bite the dust.
“If 50,000 feminists had gathered on the Mall in D.C.... accompanied with an aerial photo of the crowd.”
the Times would have assured us it “was more than a million feminists”
Which is why the news is falling apart. We don’t need them anymore.
our priest at 5:30 mass last Saturday talked about this same exact thing and predicted the non-coverage by the press last week...
did anyone expect anything different? Its like trying to find a conservative opinion on the opinion page in most major dailies. They only seem to print a conservative column when that particular column attacks Bush or conservatism.
Pro-Life bump
Do the pro-life organizations simply lack competent publicity agents, or is there really a deliberate media blackout?