Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

KBR Possibly To Be Charged With Negligent Homicide [Kellog Brown & Root / AKA Halliburton]
LiveLeak.com ^ | Jan. 22, 2009 | http://www.liveleak.com/user/Rubicon_Cube

Posted on 01/22/2009 8:23:14 PM PST by smokingfrog

BREAKING NEWS CNN (January 22/2009) 3:55pm EST:

KBR, formally Halliburton, a private contractors, through shoddy work caused electrocution deaths of U.S. soldiers in army bases in Iraq.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: brownandroot; brownroot; civiliancontractors; electrocution; halliburton; iraq; kbr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: eaglestar

Funny how CNN has the ability to find a “scoop” when it wants to while at the same time being in the dark on others.

That's because they will report anything that might have a chance of relecting poorly on George W. Bush. It is their mantra.

21 posted on 01/23/2009 3:56:33 AM PST by kempster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dead

>>>>>They were tasked with building fast, cheap housing in a war zone!<<<<<<<

Neither am I a cheerleader for KBR/Halliburton, but the good work they did far outstripped the bad at my base. In fact it was amazing to me that they’d constructed what essentially was a small town in the middle of nowhere. And they also ran the housing, commissaries, and infrastructure, all pretty darned weel in my estimation.

There were glitches, like when they ran the feed cable for our huge generator across and on top of a gravel parking lot, which caused the cable to be cut (losing all electricity) when the heavy fuel trucks came by to fill up the gen tanks (ironic that the generators would only fail when the refueling trucks were leaving the parking lot).

In the course of a few weeks the cable was replaced twice (and cut twice again when refueling took place), until Halliburton finally sent a labor crew to dig a trench and bury the cable 1 foot underground, which we’d suggested from the outset.


22 posted on 01/23/2009 4:14:25 AM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
BREAKING NEWS CNN (January 22/2009) 3:55pm EST:

I'll wait for a credible source.

23 posted on 01/23/2009 4:53:42 AM PST by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarajevo

I wonder if URS has ever been investigated for shotty work.


24 posted on 01/23/2009 5:08:06 AM PST by Perdogg (Only the hypnotized never lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lonestar

Actually it was Lady Bird’s Brown and Root.


25 posted on 01/23/2009 5:42:41 AM PST by seemoAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dead

Further evidence that there’s no reason to watch CNN.


26 posted on 01/23/2009 6:08:37 AM PST by popdonnelly (Don't lose sight of your conservative principles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

One idiot and their lawyer can sue anyone for anything in America. This may be real and maybe not.


27 posted on 01/23/2009 6:30:12 AM PST by Mustard Plaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: angkor
In the course of a few weeks the cable was replaced twice (and cut twice again when refueling took place), until Halliburton finally sent a labor crew to dig a trench and bury the cable 1 foot underground, which we’d suggested from the outset.

I don't want to get on either the support or bash KBR side. But... in my neighborhood in Dallas, the telephone and cable companies send one person to install service, and they leave the cables lying on top of the alleys where vehicles have to cross them, and a few days later, a jetting crew arrives and buries them below the alley. Sometimes vehicles break the cables before they get buried.

Now on to this issue. It may be that taking the cable burial crew from a more critical priority to immediately bury this cable was more costly or disruptive to other operations than having the temporary outages associated with the cable and the need for replacing the cable a few times. I don't know that... just speculating.

28 posted on 01/23/2009 6:43:19 AM PST by Real Cynic No More (The only thing standing between us and complete victory over the evildoers is POLITICS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Arguendo

I see nothing wrong with your assessment where I am sitting North of Baghdad.


29 posted on 01/23/2009 7:15:05 AM PST by Hawk1976 (It is better to die in battle than it is to live as a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: seemoAR

True, and every THING else was Lady Bird’s. LOL!


30 posted on 01/23/2009 7:20:10 AM PST by lonestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
A "company" cannot be charged with a criminal offense. The officers and employees of the company can be charged with criminal offenses, but a "company" cannot.

Now the prosecutors will have to determine "Who" is criminally liable within the company and prosecute them. Good luck trying to identify an individual who was both ultimately responsible and criminally liable.

This is all just a liberal press wet dream. The actual legal proceedings have about a .001% chance of success in the end. In the meanwhile, the liberal press will milk it for all it's worth, there will be no charges (or dropped charges) two to five years down the road, and everybody in America will "remember" how the evil B&R was "guilty" of negligent homicide.

That's the wash, spin, and repeat cycle of modern journalism.

31 posted on 01/23/2009 7:34:35 AM PST by been_lurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: been_lurking

See post #17.

A company can in fact be charged, but it is rare. Arthur Anderson was indicted, which led directly to its downfall since many people will not do business with a company that is under indictment, whether or not it is convicted. That indictment was quashed by the Supreme Court (I forget the exact reason), but in more extreme cases a company can be indicted.

An isolated case of negligence is not that sort of case, however.


32 posted on 01/23/2009 7:40:29 AM PST by Arguendo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
This is political for sure. Yes, short cuts are taken in a war zone, and guess what, people die in a war zone. Industrial accidents happen, and sabotage is unheard of, IN A WAR ZONE!!!.

Who gets sued/charged when a parachute fails to open? Who gets charged when the famous M4 jams? Who gets charged when.______ (fill in the blank!)

I'm not defending KBR, But I'm very suspicious of the new US communist regime.

33 posted on 01/23/2009 7:48:52 AM PST by MrPiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: squidly

When I was deployed to Iraq from 2005-7 (yes, I got the jumbo deployment) expats generally supervised work down by third country nationals. Most of the third country nationals were from Pakistan and India. Towards the end of my deployment in 2007, local Iraqi firms starting to take over a considerable portion of the work, especially road maintenance and construction of concrete blast barriers. The only supervision of the local Iraqi firms that I observed came from soldiers escorting the workers.


34 posted on 01/23/2009 8:35:29 AM PST by LuxAerterna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman
If this company did do shoddy work that resulted in the deaths of our folks, then they should be up on charges. I don’t see how what company it is makes any difference.

It sounds like a grandstanding Dem lawyer to me.

If there was really gross negligence, rather than honest mistakes, I agree with you.

35 posted on 01/23/2009 8:41:17 AM PST by TChris (So many useful idiots...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dead

I think that guy ran over and killed someone while driving, possibly intoxicated. Not sure of the details.


36 posted on 01/23/2009 9:09:09 AM PST by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: been_lurking
I was wondering myself how a company can be charged with negligent homicide. Plus I'm sure they hire many subcontractors that should be under their direct supervision, but understand that in a war zone this is not always possible. Still, it looks like some very basic electrical safety rules and codes were not followed. In this day and age, when GFCI's (ground fault circuit protectors) are cheap and readily available, this should not happen. Apparently there have been at least 13 electrocutions.
13 electrocutions, few answers

The democrats (especially people like Waxman) are definitely trying to make this into a political issue. As usual, they seem to be more interested in scoring political points than solving the problem.

37 posted on 01/23/2009 10:13:55 AM PST by smokingfrog (Never underestimate the influence of a wife who bitch-slaps her husband in public.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: squidly

Things change. I left Bagram in ‘04.

Back then, all new construction was done by HCN’s. KBR Village was constructed by HCN’s. KBR was strictly O&M.


38 posted on 01/23/2009 10:38:01 AM PST by Sarajevo (You're just jealous because the voices only talk to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TChris

You’re right about grand-standing Dem lawyering...how else
to repay those who contributed big to the ‘cause’ than to boost a career here and there. The Dems hang-out in a pit of vipers all screwing and eating each other while being victims.


39 posted on 01/23/2009 10:55:34 AM PST by seenenuf ( PREPARE TO BE TESTED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Sarajevo
Things change. I left Bagram in ‘04.

I feel for anyone who was stuck at that place. I loathe Bagram like a disease. I spent my time at Kandahar and a couple of FOBs. Considering going back. Not sure if I really want to or not.

40 posted on 01/23/2009 1:45:30 PM PST by squidly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson