Posted on 01/22/2009 7:56:16 PM PST by FreeAtlanta
ping
She makes very good points about the fraternizing of the SCOTUS and POTUS.
Because of appearances of impropriety, all nine justices will recuse themelves from this case.
-PJ
The Supreme Court has become Obama’s and the left’s whipping boys and girl. Sad.
Actually, I believe the critical part of the case on the 2000 election was 7 to 2 or 6-3.
This is what ethics is all about. Just the appearance of Obama and the Justices amounts to the same thing as committing an act of unethical behavior. How can we believe a President and Justices who do this? Especially when the Justices are denying without comment every case which I consider based on a legitimate question (Is Mr. Obama eligible to run for the POTUS).
It reeks.
Yep. Sounds like his trip to Hawaii to ‘visit his sick grandmother,’ whom he blew off after she died.
The man is a fool and it will eventually backfire on him. I just hope we are given time to get the you know what out of the way.
I thought it was from “The Onion”!
Welcome to New Kenya (Africa U.S.A.)
"Where the law of the jungle has replaced the Law of the Land"
Can the SCOTUS not see the Results of this?
If the Constitution is dead, so is our nation!
It’s a great article, although Lynn Stuter might want to be sure that her affairs are in order, as she’ll be one of the first to be rounded up and shipped off to whatever gulag opens up in her region of the USSPR (United States Socialist Peoples Republic).
[snip]
At this point, it should be very obvious to the American people, no matter their party affiliation, that the executive, legislative and judicial branches of the United States government no longer consider themselves the servant of the people, but their master.
Thank you, 'null and void' and 'autumnraine'.
Ping.
Excerpt, Related:
Orly had to explain to Mr. Bickell when he called her how we citizens got concerned when we saw the information about the cases we have all supported, worked on, and followed disappear from the docket.
Orly also had to explain to Mr. Bickell that many of us citizens are also concerned about the 8 out of 9 justices meeting privately with Mr. Obama. No reporters were allowed. No attorneys were invited on behalf of the Plaintiffs. This causes many of us citizens to question the rules of judicial ethics and causes us to question the impartiality on behalf of the justices.
Quite a number of people have contacted their senators and congressmen because of this meeting and want the justices impeached because the plaintiffs and attorneys weren’t present.
It is a good article.
This inappropriate behavior by the SCOTUS was and is wrong. No amount of excuses and explanations given by some FReepers are acceptable.
Right is right, and this wasn't.
And thanks for the Ping LucyT!
You are correct .. IT WAS 7 TO 2
The 2nd part was 5 to 4 against the FL State court.
He is a liar.
I was looking all over for that too. Than I remember Obambi actually went to the SCOTUS.
It is beginning to look like it. I am disappointed in the Justices right now.
Well .. what if the Chief Justice realized that taking the case before a court where the media would be listening might prove uncomfortable for the country and cause a Constitutional crisis.
What if the Chief Justice told the new President - either produce a birth certificate or you’re out of office.
Wouldn’t anybody want to avoid a Constitutional crisis - especially since 95% of all the blacks in this country would tear it apart if they thought for one moment - the white man - took away their black president.
I just wish a little more common sense would prevail in the world .. it would save a lot of hyperventilating.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.