Posted on 01/22/2009 2:43:37 AM PST by fabrizio
All together now and sing the Culture of Death song:
Kill 'em when they're young
Kill 'em when they're old
We hate it when they're warm
We love it when they're cold
If it took a trillion dollars to keep fat Teddy alive he would vote for it in a skipped heart beat.
1. Legislate (One must have the appearance of legality to accomplish further deeds.)
2. Confiscate (Once it has been authorized by legislation, they grab it.)
3. Incarcerate (Those who resist can be jailed.)
4. Incinerate (Those who really resist can be WACO'd.)
This is the obvious solution to the Social Security crisis. Kill the boomers and there’s no crisis.
Mostly, you can be assured of the “we voted for it, so it’s legitimate” argument.
It doesn’t matter how many people vote on it, if it’s immoral for one person to do it, it’s immoral for a group to do it.
Example: 10 men and 1 woman vote on the proposition of whether it’s OK to rape the woman. I guess if the woman disagrees, she’ll have to work harder in two years to convince 5 of the men that it’s not right for her to be raped. Until then, well, “we voted on it”!
A lib’s head will explode over this example, because it shows how logically indefensible their position is.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
The Obama administration thinks Americans are dying for change.
the thing is that private insurance companies do this too. They will refuse to pay for things or to allow people who need certain things get coverage.
and to get medicaid you have to be really, really poor with like 50 kids.
the thing is that private insurance companies do this too. They will refuse to pay for things or to allow people who need certain things get coverage.
and to get medicaid you have to be really, really poor with like 50 kids.
the thing is that private insurance companies do this too. They will refuse to pay for things or to allow people who need certain things get coverage.
and to get medicaid you have to be really, really poor with like 50 kids.
Great graphic. Shudder.
Democrat argument, heralded by media:
YOUR against healthcare??
YOU OPPOSE eaqual healthcare for all???
HOW DARE you oppose healthcare. Why are you against healthcare?
You have 4 seconds for a response on the news.
healthcare? I’m not against healthcare, I..... time up.
When the government is paying for health care through programs such as Medicare, I think it cost-benefit analyses are reasonable. I don’t want to pay for 100-year-olds getting heart transplants. I do want the freedom to pay for health care not covered by the government.
Red herring hyperbole troll argument. Isn't done.
Who would you trust to make life-or-death decisions about your health care? Your family, in association with your physician? Or a government bureaucrat?
Should life really be viewed solely through the prism of utility? The equivalent of a morning-after pill...???
ping
If the government is paying for the care, I accept the need for government regulations to weigh costs vs. benefits. Either the government will ration care, or the price system will. As a conservative I favor the latter, but unlike many conservatives here I acknowledge that there WILL be rationing.
That is what the idiots that voted for him want. I hope that they get it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.