Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: justiceseeker93; unspun

Thank you, unspun for this comment on another thread.

“Article II, Section 1, Clause 8 states: Before [the POTUS] enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation - “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of the President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

If you look at the transcript and the video, http://www.slate.com/id/2209298/?GT1=38001 that

ROBERTS: (working without a text, and also without an overcoat): Are you prepared to take the oath, Senator?

OBAMA: I am.

ROBERTS: I Barack Hussein Obama ...

OBAMA: (interrupting) I Barack ...

ROBERTS: Do solemnly swear ...

OBAMA: I, Barack Hussein Obama, do solemnly swear ...

ROBERTS: That I will execute the office of president to the United States faithfully...

OBAMA: That I will execute ... (pauses, smiles, waits for Roberts to put “faithfully” in correct spot)

ROBERTS: ... The off ... faithfully the pres ... the office of president of the United States...

OBAMA: The office of president of the United States, faithfully ... (if you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em)

ROBERTS: And will to the best of my ability ...

OBAMA: And will to [the] best of my ability ...

ROBERTS: Preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.

OBAMA: Preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.

ROBERTS: So help you God?

OBAMA: So help me God.

ROBERTS: Congratulations, Mr. President.

The Oath administered was incorrectly stated by both Chief Justice Roberts and Obama is no where in the Constitution. What does this mean? Did Chief Justice do this on purpose fully knowing that Obama is the UIC (Usurper in Chief)?

Did he does this to absolve himself of administering a perjured oath so that he can allow this fictitious usurper to get it and then remove him when evidence is shown that he does not qualify as a natural born citizen under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5.”


64 posted on 01/21/2009 11:20:36 AM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: Calpernia; Fred Nerks; null and void; pissant; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; MeekOneGOP; ...

Ping to #64.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2168896/posts?page=64#64

-

Please frmail to be removed from, or added to this ping list.


67 posted on 01/21/2009 11:25:10 AM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: LucyT

If interested, here is some new discussion from Attorney Leo Donafrio and the oath is mentioned:
http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/


72 posted on 01/21/2009 11:42:01 AM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson