Skip to comments.
Already? (Democrats Introduce Law to Repeal 22nd Amendment, allow Obama to serve > 2 terms)
National Review ^
| Monday, January 19, 2009
| [Andrew Stuttaford]
Posted on 01/19/2009 5:00:57 PM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
To: Behind Liberal Lines
LOL! I’m so scared...not! The bogeyman broadcasts are beyond getting old. Let’s do something proactive and honest.
http://falconparty.com/
41
posted on
01/19/2009 6:16:59 PM PST
by
familyop
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Since Presidents don’t seem to have any real say in running the country any more, why not just go ahead and make Obama President-For-Life? It will save a fortune because they won’t have to stage these expensive phony elections, and the taxpayers can keep the same White House china indefinitely. ;)
42
posted on
01/19/2009 6:19:47 PM PST
by
Mr. Jeeves
("One man's 'magic' is another man's engineering. 'Supernatural' is a null word." -- Robert Heinlein)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
"Representative Jose Serrano (D) has introduced a bill in the House to abolish the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution,..."
Mental retardation is a sad thing--especially in a Congressman.
43
posted on
01/19/2009 6:21:37 PM PST
by
familyop
To: brewcrew
Two-thirds of the states must ratify. Ain’t gonna happen.
Not to mention the two thirds house vote!!!
Agreed, It not gonna to happen!!
Some people just don't seem to grasp the fact that about 1/2 of the house and 90% of the senate would like to be president. They will never vote for anything that would lower their chance.
For all of you who don't know what it takes to change the Constitution, try google.
44
posted on
01/19/2009 6:24:38 PM PST
by
org.whodat
(Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts for Super-Rich Bankers! Republicans do!)
To: cripplecreek
Still open to a court decision that would stop it!! Not going to happen!!!!
45
posted on
01/19/2009 6:27:55 PM PST
by
org.whodat
(Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts for Super-Rich Bankers! Republicans do!)
To: org.whodat
Uh huh sure.
Just keep saying that.
46
posted on
01/19/2009 6:29:31 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Look Up “Con Con Constitutional Convention” on google: They don’t have to do this; they’re on the verge or rewriting our constitution anyway, either this or throught the courts, and UN (Senate-treaty)!
47
posted on
01/19/2009 6:30:18 PM PST
by
JSDude1
(R(epublicans) In Name Only SUCK; D(emocrats) In Name Only are worth their weight..)
To: familyop
Mental retardation is a sad thing--especially in a Congressman. BINGO!!!!
48
posted on
01/19/2009 6:30:43 PM PST
by
org.whodat
(Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts for Super-Rich Bankers! Republicans do!)
To: cripplecreek
49
posted on
01/19/2009 6:32:32 PM PST
by
org.whodat
(Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts for Super-Rich Bankers! Republicans do!)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
This is similar to the fool that took literally obammas statement about a new deceleration.
Moon Beams!!!
50
posted on
01/19/2009 6:40:06 PM PST
by
org.whodat
(Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts for Super-Rich Bankers! Republicans do!)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Well he is after all the most qualified President we've ever had. We really don't need elections any more. We've reached Nirvana!
51
posted on
01/19/2009 6:41:15 PM PST
by
Lexinom
To: Behind Liberal Lines
HEy - the idea has worked for Huga Chavez... why not here???
[/sarcasm]
52
posted on
01/19/2009 6:41:33 PM PST
by
TheBattman
(Pray for our country....)
To: A.A. Cunningham
What’s friggin’ amazing is how many here don’t know about the point you made.
And I used to think that conservatives understood the basics of American government and civics. Not anymore, most here seem to be nothing more than reverse-liberals. Acting exactly like a liberal, but for ‘our’ side.
53
posted on
01/19/2009 6:42:26 PM PST
by
gogogodzilla
(Live free or die!)
To: Secret Agent Man
It would never have enough states to ratify it. No way. See post 16 (the one right above yours)...
54
posted on
01/19/2009 6:42:52 PM PST
by
TheBattman
(Pray for our country....)
To: Bobalu
Imagine if what you said happened 2-7 years ago... think President Bush would have remained in office?
Be careful what you wish for, you just might get it.
55
posted on
01/19/2009 6:44:07 PM PST
by
gogogodzilla
(Live free or die!)
To: bill1952
"The bill is absurd. Its never going to happen that 3/4s of the states will ratify anything like that."
Hmmm! Similar logic failed to stop the 16th!
Wish-full thinking...
To: mvpel
Sorry, charlie - that map isn’t right... it is from May 2008. there were some changes to the map... quite a few.
57
posted on
01/19/2009 6:45:02 PM PST
by
TheBattman
(Pray for our country....)
To: SuperLuminal
> Similar logic failed to stop the 16th!
Wish-full thinking...
Not even remotely similar.
Not wishful thinking at all.
3/4s of the states today could not agree on thing one.
58
posted on
01/19/2009 6:52:59 PM PST
by
bill1952
(McCain and the GOP were worthless)
To: brewcrew
“Two-thirds of the states must ratify.
Ain’t gonna happen.”
Two-thirds of congress and three-quarters of the states is needed to pass a Constitutional Amendment I believe.
59
posted on
01/19/2009 7:18:25 PM PST
by
CapnJack
To: Behind Liberal Lines
LOL... Liberal pipe dream. Considering it would take 2/3 of the states to ratify, and a lot of them have term limits or would like them, for their own officials....
Didn't they float this crap for the Toon?
Now granted, the Criminal Party doesn't give a damn about the Constitution.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson