Q. What’s an example of irony?
A. Bruce Springsteen is scheduled to sing “Born in the USA” at Barack Obama’s inauguration.
http://barackobamajokes.googlepages.com/inauguration_jokes
pinger
I think even St Jude might be giving up on this particular lost cause. By hook-or-by-crook (”crook”, in this case) Obama is going to be your next POTUS...
...on the up-side, there is a huge pile of dung out there somewhere, and a massive propellor has begun to slowly spin. It will take a couple of years to fully gain speed and momentum, but for all intents and purposes it should be good-to-go in a couple days time.
Also sighted is a large flock of homeless chickens, hovering in the airspace in-and-around Washington DC, in a holding pattern. Their arms are going to get tired really soon, say in a couple days or so and they will need to land.
Soon these things will be Obama’s problem. This should be interesting to watch!
As I see it there are but two possibilities that are reasonably likely.
1. Our dear overlords in the elite deciding class have quietly been informed of the disturbing contents of 0bama’s birth certificate; he was born in the USA but something really embarrassing to him is there, and our dear overlords have decided that it’s enough for him to account to them privately, he need not be accountable to us. We have no standing. We are not entitled to proof, his discomfort is more important than ours. No need for court of justice. This decision would entail some specific dear overlords, like 0bama and the CJ who will swear him in. (Do we want to believe this of John Roberts?)
2. 0bama was not born in the USA, is stonewalling the dear overlords, and they do not give a damn whether he’s qualified or not. They don’t want trouble.
The second possibility requires us to believe that when it comes to the rule of law, 0bama and Roberts (et al.) are ultimately guys in the same neighborhood. It’s just a matter of whether they’ve talked privately, or not.
Dear Mr. ( ):
Thank you for your correspondence concerning the lawsuits regarding the qualifications of Senator Barak Obama to serve as President. It was good to hear from you and I appreciate the opportunity to respond.
As you may know, plaintiffs have filed several lawsuits against various defendants over the definitions of the constitutional requirements of the Office of the President and Mr. Obama’s ability to meet them.
I greatly appreciate the insight and concern of my fellow Missourians on the critical issues before the House of Representatives. At this time, most of the lawsuits on this matter have been dismissed by judges at the trial and appellate court levels. The Supreme Court of the United States has also dismissed one case. Another case, on appeal to the Supreme Court is awaiting a decision on whether they will review it.
The Democrat Congress will not consider this issue. If trial courts are unwilling to hear the case and decide the outcome based upon the evidence, then only a procedural argument can proceed to the appeals courts. Those arguments are legally difficult to win. Barring a court ordered examination, little chance exists that a copy of president-elect Obama’s Hawaiian birth records will be opened to the public unless requested by Mr. Obama himself; which he has as of yet refused to do so.
Again, thank you for taking the time to contact my office. I share your concern for protecting the U.S. Constitution, and, I will certainly keep your thoughts in mind if I have the opportunity to publicly address this issue.
It is a privilege to represent you and I hope that you will not hesitate to contact me regarding any matter where I might be of assistance. If you would like more information on issues, or would like to share further thoughts with me via e-mail, you may visit my website.
Sincerely,
W. Todd Akin
Member of Congress
Every American I talk to when I bring this issue up cannot believe it. Their response is, "why haven't we heard about this?" or something to that effect.
What does served with a demand mean? Is that a legal term? Or does it mean that someone wrote a letter to Occidental asking to see the records? It doesn't sound like there was a subpoena involved....
WHO had demanded?
I'm just waiting for someone to produce the REAL birth certificate. I can see the headline on Drudge now “ OBAMA IS A FRAUD!”
I’m with the others. What does:
“have been served with a demand to produce”
mean?
Did a court order it or some concerned citizen?
It's not just the BC it's fighting every attempt to unlock any information that Obama wants kept hidden from Americans.
I say again, foreign intel agencies will likely have no problem whatsoever getting all that information and making it available for use.
Thus, Obama is indeed the first blackmail president.
Shirley you jest. ;-)
The most likely way to expose the fraud is via a foreign agent. How?...I’m not sure, but the front door approach by many good Americans is not effecting the immovable objects. A back door or covert action has a better chance to get the information.
The next question is, how will the public react? Unfortunately, I don’t think they care.
Hopefully, they will also handcuff Joe Biden, Dinjy Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and Howard Dean for the cover-up.
You said — “Even though a little late for the swearing in, still would be great to watch him being led off in handcuffs from the Oval Office a week after being sworn in.”
I was asking about that very thing, from other FReepers here, and it was told to me that the only way a President could be removed was through Congress with Impeachment and Conviction.
I asked specifically if a Marshal could walk into the White House with court orders and escort Obama off the premises and/or escort to jail like you’re saying and the answers I got back was “no way” ...
Were you just speaking in hyperbole, and not “for real”?
I don’t know if this has been already brought up, but have any post been made that addresses the silence on this issue from Rush Limbaugh? I have tried to stay on top of his radio as well as his website but have not noticed any comments from Rush. Is there a reason for him not commenting on the subject? This could probably be addressed via another thread but maybe someone could point this out in a simple post to this one. Thanks.