Well, to answer a number of your “cognitive” accusations, let us examine the posts.
“Anyone can climb those stairs. People do it all the time,” you mock, eh?”
And you said, “absolutely no cognitive connection”, eh? I didn’t even post that statement concerning stairs.
Let’s all take a look at Mr. Lane (I wonder if you bothered to ask permission from the family before using Mr. Lane’s story and name).
You accused me, among other things, of being a “leftist” “state-control-loving mind” “degeneratively ill” shouting person. How amusing, considering the fact that you linked to and sited an EDITORIAL from THE NEW YORK TIMES. Here are some gems from the editorial:
“Incredibly, there is a real chance the Supreme Court will side with Tennessee. The courts conservative majority has been on a misguided “federalism” campaign, denying Congress’s power to protect the environment, combat gun violence and discrimination.”
Did you all read that, Freepers? Whose talking about “control” here? And read this insightful fact:
“Mr. Lane who had had minor run-ins with the law before”
Gondring, you have accused me of lacking “cognitive” skills in reading this thread, which is about SUICIDE, and yet you site Mr. Lane’s incident, which is (and pay close attention, FReepers) about ACCESSIBILITY for the DISABLED. I’ll go further in stating that the editorial is using these disabled individuals (as I stated before) to push their own anti-American (remember the “federalism”) agenda.
In closing, I will point out one thing in order to tie, unlike Gondring’s free associating, Mr. Lane’s incident to the thread. Gondring slanderous insinuates that I believe:
“...anyone can commit suicide at will”
If Mr. Lane can crawl up the stairs to the courthouse, he has the ability to commit suicide. So, using Mr. Lane’s, as you took the opportunity to do so in making an irrelevant point, example does not support the thread concerning suicide.
Now, who’s “absolutely” lacking in “cognitive connection”?
Nah.
Your red herrings are stink to high heaven, but we don't need to let them distract us from the main point. Mr. Lane's character is irrelevant to whether all people are capable of walking up stairs (as an analogy to your claim that everyone is able to commit suicide unassisted).
You accused me, among other things, of being a “leftist” “state-control-loving mind” “degeneratively ill” shouting person.
I certainly did not.
But I will now accuse you of making false claims against me.
And as for being of leftist slant, it seems to me that you're the one who wants to pay to have the State to step in and arrest people who would assist people who desire help. You seem to want to spend taxpayer money to block people from getting medications they want. You seem to want to spend taxpayer money to control peoples' lives. That's rather leftist.
How amusing, considering the fact that you linked to and sited an EDITORIAL from THE NEW YORK TIMES. Here are some gems from the editorial:
Who said that I advocated the ideas in the editorial? I was just trying to help you, since you seemed unable to conduct a simple search to inform yourself about something so important to the American republic (a major SCOTUS decision with far-reaching implications for states' rights). It was a freebie...if you want more, you'll have to pay my research consulting rate.
If Mr. Lane can crawl up the stairs to the courthouse, he has the ability to commit suicide
Wow...you really have to get out more. There are many different forms of disability.
I suggest you include in your studies the concept of analogies.
Now, who’s “absolutely” lacking in “cognitive connection”?
You.
Whew, you forget quickly.