Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sickoflibs
He had 90% and a republican congress in early 2003.

Don't blame President Bush for losing the Republican majority in Congress. They did that all on their own with their profligate spending and by turning their backs on the conservative message. The President was concentrating most fully on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Most of that 90% approval was from folks who still had intact memories of 9/11, and were truly frightened that it could happen again. The further away we got from 9/11, folks started forgetting WHY we were in Afghanistan and Iraq, and started believing the constant negative drumbeat from the MSM, and sadly, from much of what passes for the conservative media in the US.

As for the collapse of parts of the economy, I am truly suspicious of the timing of it. The housing bubble had burst two years ago, but the big bad news about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac didn't come out until the summer before the Presidential election? Color me suspicious; the timing was just a little too coincidental.

President Bush had tried, in 2003, and again, in 2005, to get legislation through that would have mitigated much of the financial distress caused by the problems with mortgages, but the Democrats blocked him. He didn't get much support from Republicans in Congress, either, because they were too cowed by the screaming Democrats and the MSM on the war situation. They also had no credibility with their own voters on any fiscal matters, as they discovered, to their chagrin in November of 2006, when they lost their majority.

52 posted on 01/17/2009 1:22:46 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: SuziQ

“As for the collapse of parts of the economy, I am truly suspicious of the timing of it. The housing bubble had burst two years ago, but the big bad news about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac didn’t come out until the summer before the Presidential election? Color me suspicious; the timing was just a little too coincidental.”

SuzyQ, I am with you. Capital markets are forward-looking, and in terms of timing there is no doubt but that it tanked as the election of Barack Obama became more certain, and as it became clearer that the Dems would take large majorities of both legislative branches.

Conservative pundits are too timid to point out this timing.


59 posted on 01/18/2009 2:40:21 AM PST by drellberg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson