Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Madoff's fund may not have made a single trade
Reuters ^ | 16 Jan 2009 | Jason Szep

Posted on 01/16/2009 4:45:58 PM PST by BGHater

Bernie Madoff's investment fund may never have executed a single trade, industry officials say, suggesting detailed statements mailed to investors each month may have been an elaborate mirage in a $50 billion fraud.

An industry-run regulator for brokerage firms said on Thursday there was no record of Madoff's investment fund placing trades through his brokerage operation.

That means Madoff either placed trades through other brokerage firms, a move industry officials consider unlikely, or he was not executing trades at all.

"Our exams showed no evidence of trading on behalf of the investment advisor, no evidence of any customer statements being generated by the broker-dealer," said Herb Perone, spokesman for the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

Madoff's broker-dealer operation, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, underwent routine examinations by FINRA and its predecessor, the National Association of Securities Dealers, every two years since it opened in 1960, Perone said.

Madoff, a former chairman of the Nasdaq Stock Market who was a force on Wall Street for nearly 50 years, allegedly confessed to his sons the firm's investment-advisory business was "basically a giant Ponzi scheme" and "one big lie," according to court documents.

He estimated losses of at least $50 billion from the Ponzi scheme, which uses money from new investors to pay distributions and redemptions to existing investors. Such schemes typically collapse when new funds dry up.

Each month, Madoff sent out elaborate statements of trades conducted by his broker-dealer. Last November, for example, he issued a statement to one investor showing he bought shares of Merck & Co Inc, Microsoft Corp, Exxon Mobil Corp and Amgen Inc among others.

It also showed transactions in Fidelity Investments' Spartan Fund. But Fidelity, the world's biggest mutual fund company, has no record of Madoff or his company making any investments in its funds.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: bernardmadoff; economy; finra; fraud; fund; madoff; markmadoff; maryshapiro; ponzi; wallstreet

1 posted on 01/16/2009 4:45:58 PM PST by BGHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BGHater

And they have tried to set it up that his sons only worked on the brokerage side of the business and therefore had NO idea what was going on. Right . . .

Your dad has a $50 billion hedge fund and runs no trades through the broker/dealer he owns. Sure. And I have a bridge in Brooklyn for sale.


2 posted on 01/16/2009 4:48:51 PM PST by rockvillem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

I see one reason we get so many dupes on FR - the MSM dupes their own stories. This headline ran a few days ago, and here it is again on the Yahoo! site today with a current datestamp.


3 posted on 01/16/2009 4:51:54 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (revolution is in the air.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockvillem
And I have a bridge in Brooklyn for sale.

And I got a check for ya. Just tell me how much you want for that thing.

4 posted on 01/16/2009 4:52:37 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (revolution is in the air.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rockvillem

Just imagine what the late-night comedians would really be saying if they were not constrained by the (unwritten) rules of Political Correctness.

I just wish I had enough bank to join his country club.


5 posted on 01/16/2009 4:53:24 PM PST by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

LOL.

If this is true, the whole argument that “my sons at the broker/dealer were SHOCKED, SHOCKED to find out it was a fraud” kind of goes out the window, doesn’t it?

Try saying with a straight face - “my dad has a $50 billion hedge fund but doesn’t run any trades through his own brokerage firm”. It takes Clintonian levels of pathology to pull it off :-)


6 posted on 01/16/2009 5:01:12 PM PST by rockvillem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rockvillem
It takes Clintonian levels of pathology to pull it off :-)

Indeed.

7 posted on 01/16/2009 5:05:58 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (revolution is in the air.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rockvillem; BGHater; the invisib1e hand; Enchante
Mark D. Madoff, Co-Director of Trading, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, was on FINRA Mutual Fund Task Force : NASD Names 20 To Mutual Fund Task Force since June 2004.

One issue that is not much talked about is FINRA (NASD before 2007), because most people's attention was on SEC, which doesn't really regulate privately owned hedge funds, only their activities in public marketplace:

"Our exams showed no evidence of trading on behalf of the investment advisor, no evidence of any customer statements being generated by the broker-dealer," said Herb Perone, spokesman for the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

From NY Post: Bernie's Fake Trades

Chairman and CEO of FINRA is Mary Shapiro (SEC Commissioner since 1988 by Reagan appointment, Acting Chairman of SEC since 1993 by Clinton appointment, Chairman of CFTC since 1994 by Clinton appointment, President of NASD Regulation since 1996, Vice Chairman of NASD since 2002, Chairman and CEO of NASD in 2006) who is slated to become head of SEC in Obama administration. So where was FINRA during all these years? Could be a good question to ask Mary Shapiro during confirmation hearings?

8 posted on 01/17/2009 11:22:16 AM PST by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy

LOL, smoke-and-mirrors is how the Demagogues do politics, so I guess it should be no surprise that this is how they approach running a $50 billion hedge fund, too!!

I have to say I did expect that Madoff would run a lot of trades SOMEWHERE, just so that he would always have evidence of some real investment activity..... he must have had great confidence that he could get away with just about anything, and he did for 2 decades apparently.

WOW, Shapiro needs to fry! Will any Rs grow a spine and do something about this?


9 posted on 01/17/2009 12:06:50 PM PST by Enchante (Jan. 20, 2009: There is not enough scotch whiskey in the world to drown my sorrows now..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
I have to say I did expect that Madoff would run a lot of trades SOMEWHERE, just so that he would always have evidence of some real investment activity.....

It doesn't hurt to have your own trading floor where one can profit handsomely by illegal frontrunning of trades, or own the virtual exhange or quasi-ECN.

Madoff to leverage liquidity :

Sounds pretty vague and very "flexible" in things they could do. His and his siblings' hands were in a lot of cookie jars.

10 posted on 01/17/2009 3:09:18 PM PST by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy

I’ve always been suspect of front running on ECN’s and proprietary front ends and have seem some pretty shaky software shenannigans but in Madoff’s Fund’s case it appears to be moot.


11 posted on 01/17/2009 4:42:49 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (revolution is in the air.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand
... but in Madoff’s Fund’s case it appears to be moot.

Appears to be... In which case, if I were Andrew, Mark or Peter, would I never be curious about father / brother never sending any of his Fund's business their way? Could not possibly be about appearance of impropriety? Also, have any of the trading business profits ever go (or borrowed) into the Fund side to sustain the Ponzi scheme or was it always smoothly self-sustained from new inflow for that many years?

12 posted on 01/17/2009 5:42:50 PM PST by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy
Too many unknowns for me at the moment. Still trying to get my head around the idea that it was smoke and mirrors from the beginning.

It's halfway reasonable (though by no means excusable) if he got buried on a trade and then panicked, buying time until a recovery. Or if he got cold feet and put the money in T-Bills.

If he didn't trade the money, what did he do with it? Put in a bank account? Surely that's been figured out by now.

13 posted on 01/17/2009 6:35:55 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (revolution is in the air.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson