Posted on 01/16/2009 12:36:53 PM PST by Sidebar Moderator
That’s what I thought. {{{crickets}}}
Troll crickets?
Wellllll, looky there! I got a bite on both lines.
And if you were joking, then, "Oh, no...you're on to me! ;-)"
Yep, just give me a fishing pole and a box of crickets and I’m all set for a little troll trolling. ;^)
Thanks...I am sure that anything I post gives away the fact I am a newbie!
He does love his Blackbarry(s) doesn't he?
Did you hear that he dropped his Blackberry today? Where would we be without the MSM?
Here’s a discussion we had on that other thread that seems pertinent. Let’s get the admin moderator to agree what the definition of troll is so we can start workups on all the certifiGate trolls operating right now.
To: hoosiermama; Jim Robinson; Star Traveler
Please stop using the term TROll .
***Id be more than happy to if the recipient does not fit the definition of troll. Where is that definition? Ive offered to help generate it, no takers. Star fits the definition of an issue-specific troll.
It is not in the interest of open expersion of ideas and Star is really trying to share his thoughts.
***When its an open expression of the same debunked troll argument for the 15th time, its time to use the word Troll.
They may not be the same as yours , but he (as we all do) still have our right to express them.
***I dont deny him the right to express them, I just think he fits the definition of troll. Hes here to disrupt. He admits he does it for entertainment. Thats not conducive to open expression of ideas, is it?
810 posted on 01/15/2009 10:06:32 PM PST by Kevmo ( It’s all over for this Country as a Constitutional Republic. ~Leo Donofrio, 12/14/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 801 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
We do try to clean those up when reported or when we catch them. It is why reporting is so important if you see it.
***It doesn’t seem like you folks tried very hard here. As a result, the keyword abuse has continued to today. What gives?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2146370/posts?page=29#29
To: LucyT; pissant; SE Mom; Calpernia; Polarik; Admin Moderator
For your respective ping lists, and also for the mods to once again investigate keyword abuse on certifigate threads.
blackhelicopters; conspiracytheories; nirther; nutobamatrollsdaily; tinfoilhats; wingnutdaily;
26 posted on Thursday, December 11, 2008 1:34:26 AM by Kevmo (Palin/Hunter 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
To: Kevmo
We will not look into your request.
Thanks,
27 posted on Thursday, December 11, 2008 9:45:37 AM by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
To: Admin Moderator; Jim Robinson
We will not look into your request.
***The admin mod did before and the troll Searchin was zotted. I notice that was when JimRob was ccd. My keyword abuse investigation requests will be ccing JimRob from now on.
28 posted on Thursday, December 11, 2008 1:11:10 PM by Kevmo (Palin/Hunter 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
To: Kevmo
Whatever floats your boat.
29 posted on Thursday, December 11, 2008 1:27:54 PM by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
I appreciate your ping. Star travelor had been away from the threads for severl weeks and was trying to join in the conversation....There was no reason for the name calling except you recognized the name... Maybe the poster had a change of style....maybe even a change of heart...
Sorry sir but you were out of line then and are out of line now in thinking that name calling is a respectable form of communication or debate...and I’ll stand by my original post for you to stop it.
It’s a form of invalidation and is not acceptable between adults. No matter which side of the issue you are on......
So some of the mods are trolls, then? They like keyword spam trolldom?
(BTW - your dissection - or would it be vivisection - of ST’s logorrhea were stellar!!)
Decades of experience has shown that the most effective way to deal with trolling is to ignore those who troll.
***That doesn’t work against gangs of trolls. We saw that in the tootyfruityrudy brigade, and many of them committed freepercide on the bugzapper thread. How many of them didn’t? Several of them have returned.
Now we see similar tactics on the CoLB threads. When trolls play tag team, it’s time for the higher ups at FR to do something about the problem or they just invite more abuse.
Here’s a nickel’s worth of free mentoring:
First, when you disagree and dispute another poster, do so respectfully, at least the first time.
Second, when you make a sarcastic remark that may be out of context, or could be mistaken for a serious remark, use the “/sarc” tag (that means “end-sarcasm” :)
Third, use documented (or at least documentable) facts to make your point.
Fourth, if someone posts something you don’t understand (due to phrases, jargon, acronyms, or whatever reason), ask what they mean. If they object to am honest question, they’re just being a jerk.
Which brings us to the fifth penny in your free nickel... Have fun, and don’t take the debates here on FR personally. If you are passionate about a topic, that doesn’t mean you are more or less of a person when you win or lose a particular discussion.
Of course, there are other long time (and LONGER time) posters who might disagree with every point I’ve made, so...
Ill stand by my original post for you to stop it.
***And I stand by my original assessment that ST fits the definition. It’s plain for all to see. Of course, part of that issue is whether the mods stick to what’s mentioned here as the definition or if they have their own that we don’t know about.
This should be a formal process of open accusation, show how the troll fits the definition on an open thread, and let the mods decide out in the open. Everyone learns that way. It’s simple. KISS.
Perhaps you have not been interacting with ST the way Kevmo and others have. There is a history with that person and several of us - just pinged two of them - have dealt with the purposeful disrution for a long time. Anyone who admits that they post in such a manner for their own entertainment is admitting they are a troll; along with the other evidence such as Kevmo has noted. People who just aren’t up to speed or have rational disagreements are conspicuous by different manner, attitude and posting history.
So some of the mods are trolls, then?
***No Freepin’ Way. My assessment is that they’re just... really busy. Having an open troll accusation thread would help them do their jobs rather than hinder them, and everyone would learn. A rare Win-win-win.
Heck, I didn’t mean you said that! I was sort of tongue in cheek...
Please post (in full) the footnoted sources of the information you are claiming.
How do you know that kicking their @sses! will do any good? Are you a professional kicker ?? Do you have some special affinity for @sses?
What exactly are you not telling us?
***To add:
Where are the procedures and statutes for “kick their @sses”? It’s up to YOU to prove that they “kick their @sses”? I’m not convinced — show me the notarized and signed proof that someone just “kicked their @sses”. Just because the highest law of the land says you can’t “kick their @sses” doesn’t mean anything — where are the statutes and procedures for “kick their @sses”?
I don’t need no steenkin’ trouble with the mods...
Where’s the html tag for /TongueInCheek?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.