Posted on 01/16/2009 2:57:22 AM PST by JohnHuang2
There is obviously no limit to the political left's bloodlust for all things George W. Bush, as witnessed by two news items this week. If Barack Obama is as levelheaded and pragmatic as his supporters insist, he'll have his work cut out for him dealing with these avengers on his side of the ideological spectrum.
On Tuesday, House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers issued a 500-page report, whose executive summary boasts "was drafted to itemize and document the various abuses that occurred during the Bush Administration." The report recommends "that the new Administration conduct an independent criminal inquiry into whether any laws were broken in connection with these activities."
The same day, Slate magazine published an op-ed by Yale law professor Bruce Ackerman suggesting that 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Jay Bybee be impeached, essentially because "he was responsible for the notorious torture memos that enabled the excesses at Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, and other places."
Both of these items are equally outrageous and demonstrate the potential dangerousness of leftists in power. How ironic that the gravamen of each complaint is an alleged abuse of power while its recommended remedy would constitute a worse abuse (the criminalization of policy differences), especially considering the weakness of the complaints.
The Conyers vendetta seeks to criminally probe Bush officials involved with the National Security Agency's surveillance program, the tough interrogation techniques of enemy combatants, the manipulation of intelligence, the firing of U.S. attorneys, and other matters.
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
Mr. Misunderestimated won't be misunderestimated much longer
Bush's address tonight beamed with all that became his trademark qualities and attributes: Magnanimity, pure class, relentless charm, dazzling wit, unyielding resolve, simple grace, easy elegance and quiet dignity seasoned with thoughtfulness, firmness of purpose and a hang-tough adherence to moral principles and conviction -- the very things that for eight years drove liberals to embrace madness.
The speech was marked by Bush's relentless optimism and his indisputable sense of confidence, epitomizing why the man connected with voters so well as to win two terms. Yet, if any reminder was needed that George W. Bush was that rare politician who didn't give a lick about polls nor image-making nor how he should package himself, whose appeal to people was rooted in action and his principled stand on issues, this speech -- a no-apologies tour de force of the Bush record -- was it. You may not always agree with him but he always says what he means and you're never in doubt as to where the chap stands.
Bush is at once a powerful leader and a humble man, a take-charge president imbued with a warm, gentle decency and quiet politeness and decorum unheard of in politics, yet a man who wasn't just marking time but instead leaving a permanent imprint in the sands of history.
Even against the sustained heavy artillery barrage of personal attacks these past eight years, Bush remained an undaunted living profile in dignity and poise, ungrudgingly carrying out the most difficult task in the most stressful job in the world -- leading America in wartime with liberal ninnies nagging every step of the way. For eight years, libbies have hysterically attacked Bush as a war criminal, war deserter, warmonger, moron, 9/11 mastermind, idiot, liar, Nazi, evil Zionist, Texas theocrat, murderer -- all the while prodigiously cranking out books and movies dreaming of the day when Bush gets knocked off. For liberals, it was a profound disappointment that a live grenade that landed near Bush in Tbilisi's Freedom's Square didn't go off.
Bush, never whining nor stooping to the level of his insane critics, is a man truly more than worthy of the office -- unlike that empty suit what's-his-face who'll enter it in four days.
Other than liberating 60 million people in Iraq and Afghanistan and creaming al-Qaeda on its home court and forcing Libya to cry uncle and busting up the A.Q. Khan network (just in time to bring Laura her coffee on a tray in the morning!), perhaps no aspect of Bush's foreign policy has infuriated liberals more than Bush's unflinching and courageous support of Israel. Liberals opposed toppling Saddam Hussein because it would help Israel. Liberals oppose bombing Iran because it would help Israel. Before getting toppled from his golden toilet seat in Bush's "failed" war, Saddam was busily showering money on murderers of Jews in Israel. Upping the ante, Iran's nuclear mullahs want to nuke Israel off the map. So nothing enrages liberals more than Bush's support of Jews in their right to defend themselves. Bush would be hailed as a hero if only he would let Muslims finish the job Hitler started.
To be sure, Bush made his share of mistakes, don't we all? And you can quibble over this or that nettlesome single issue or pet peeve, but the upshot of Bush's tenure isn't the Dow Jones or Bush's poll position in France, but rather his performance on what came to be the core issue of his presidency, emblemized in the clarion call blaring defiantly from his bullhorn amid the ruins of Manhattan in 9/11's wake. From atop a charred firetruck, surrounded by crowds of cheering firefighters and rescue workers in hardhats, Bush famously declared the days of fraidy-cat, wimpy kid-glove treatment for homicidal Islamic maniacs are over. The Taliban soon got a taste of what he meant. What would Obama have done? "Well, the first thing we'd have to do is make sure we've got an effective emergency response . . . [then] find out do we have any intelligence on who might have carried it out . . ." Hmmm, planes flown into skyscrapers . . . whodunnit? Any ideas??? The Jesuits? The Amish?
Whereas Zero's first act after a ghastly 9/11-style attack is to check with FEMA, Bush more than rose to the occasion, laying out the blueprint to fix the problem and win the war, regularly delivering laser-guided messages to al-Qaeda that the Ol' Great Satan is in it for the long haul. The old paradigm was 'reactive', the new paradigm was pro-active. Liberals responded by poring over Bush's every move to find mistakes, then running to MSNBC to pout on TV.
In fact, the Big Lie is the Lie that Democrats fully supported the war against Muslim fanatics after 9/11. Two weeks after the U.S. air campaign in Afghanistan was launched, Joe Biden started whining that the war was dragging on too long for him. "How much longer does the bombing continue?" the little Treasoncrat wanted to know. "Because we're going to pay every single hour, every single day it continues, we're going to pay an escalating price in the Muslim world." Biden complained hysterically that "bombing" terrorists from the air "plays into every stereotypical criticism of us" as "this high-tech bully." We should sit down and talk to the Taliban, play nice and all will be well. This little twerp is America's next vice president. Not to worry, his boss is President-elect Nobody.
The general consensus among the media class is that history will be kinder to Bush than they were, an implicit admission that they were lying about him all along, or presenting only a little slice of the picture. But you don't need to wait years for things to play out when six months (or less) will do. Already, Obama is moving rapidly to build the most inept and corrupt administration since the last Democrat administration, whether it's appointing a tax cheat to head the Treasury, a bribe-by to head Commerce (since withdrawn), a scandal factory punkster for chief of staff, a mental case for Climate Commissar, or Eric Holder to "rigorously and impartially" break the law at DOJ. But, hold on. In the Blaggy affair, you've got Rahm, Axelrod and Obama. In short, this could go as high as the top three stooges.
The whiners will whine on about Katrina and Abu Ghraib, but if the "Palestinians" haven't danced in the streets in seven years, you've got Bushitler's war to blame for that. Not so much as an itty-bitty, itsy-bitsy, teensy-weensy al-Qaeda firecracker has gone off on U.S. soil since 9/11, and the best the Jihadi lads can muster these days is binny's sickly voice on cheap audiotape. But all this is more than just how many "warrantless" wiretap bills or Patriot Acts got passed or the number of fierce bureaucrats filling positions at Homeland Security. Fat lotta good it does to have these tools if the chap at the top doesn't have the crazies convinced that he's crazier than they are. At Jihad Central, I doubt the admonition is, 'We have nothing to fear but the Patriot Act itself!'
One 9/11 hit cost binny and the boys two terrorist sanctuaries -- Afghanistan and Iraq. Not to slough off wiretaps and the Patriot Act, but a big deterrent factor has been Bush himself. Thoughts of Bush aren't where jihadists go to get warm and fuzzy feelings.
Mr. President, thank you for your unwavering leadership, for your steadfast resolve, for your unyielding determination to keep us safe, for giving of yourself in the most thankless job imaginable. May God bless you and Laura with lots of health and happiness in the years ahead. We miss you already.
Anyway, that's...
My Two Cents...
"JohnHuang2"
The left has to quickly snuff out all potential source of not only opposition but questioning of their policies.
Show trials of the Bush administration will only be the start.
The article talks about the danger of leftists in power. No kidding. They are pushing America towards civil war.
Bush thought it was in the interest of the country to show magnanimity. The Democrats learned the lesson that stonewalling works, and they repaid Bush with eight years of unremitting viciousness. Interesting choice for Obama.
Having saved his Detroit constituents, Conyers can now go on to rid the world of Republicans.
Given enough power, they’ll be looking to round up Republicans/conservatives as collaborators and what not. If we aren’t with them, we’re against them apparently. There are level heads amongst them but, unfortunately, the calmest voices tend to be drowned out in a sea of howling madness.
That would be a big mistake for the ones doing the “showing.”
If the Left tries this, we must be ready to go to the people and have them pressure President Tingod not to carry these plans out. Forget the MSM; if they were really that influential, the networks and newspapers would be making money. We have the Internet; we can't use tools like Twitter and podcasting to reach our own?
And of course we must question their policies. We must adopt the attitude “Opposition is not treason.”
Good take on President Bush, sir. Bump to the top.
To be honest, we wanted to go after the Clinton’s and their staff for their cr@p... after they left office.
It was President Bush that stopped that line of action.
One of the most despicable individuals in Congress.
Don’t discount the MSM. The issue is not money: it’s authority.
Many Americans will not commit to what they see with their own eyes without some perceived “authority” validating it.
Obama ain’t Bush! Cripe, he ain’t even a real American for God’s sake.
This ain’t good......
“They are pushing America towards civil war.”
My thoughts exactly.
John “frozen turkey” Conyers is nothing be a pimp!
Well said.
Since the courts have now allowed the wiretaps, we should get a cost estimate of how much of the taxpayers money Conyers wasted in his fruitless venture.
Bravo for an excellent post on a very courageous President.
The courts have just given wiretaps a green light for the Democrats coming into Executive power. If a Republican is ever elected to the Excecutive again you can bet the courts will shut it down again.
“blood lust of the avenging left”
correction: “blood lust of the psychotics”
IMHO
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.