Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigerLikesRooster
As recently as October 7, in a presidential debate, Mr Obama said: "We will kill bin Laden. We will crush al Qaeda. That has to be our biggest national security priority."

But yesterday, the President-elect adopted far less aggressive language...."I think that we have to so weaken [bin Laden's] infrastructure that, whether he is technically alive or not, he is so pinned down that he cannot function,"

I'm sure the American media will be juxtaposing these two statements. Any day now.

32 posted on 01/14/2009 10:34:35 PM PST by denydenydeny (If pigs could vote, the man with the slop bucket would be elected swineherd every time-OS Card)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: denydenydeny
As recently as October 7, in a presidential debate, Mr Obama said: "We will kill bin Laden. We will crush al Qaeda. That has to be our biggest national security priority."

But yesterday, the President-elect adopted far less aggressive language...."I think that we have to so weaken [bin Laden's] infrastructure that, whether he is technically alive or not, he is so pinned down that he cannot function,"

As I mentioned when the words Al-Qaeda first spewed forth from ObamMessiah, that Al-Qaeda would be the one terrorist group NOT targeted by USA if Obama became President. This is a clear case of "taqiyya, the Muslin word for "Please don't throw me in that Brier Patch," or, if you prefer a very red herring.

57 posted on 01/15/2009 8:27:51 AM PST by Polarik ("A forgery created to prove a claim repudiates that claim")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson