“Yes, WE already know this stuff, mostly because we like Sarah Palin and read blogs about Sarah Palin and so on. Most Americans don’t follow events like Freepers do. So, by doing these interviews and (hopefully) having them picked up by the MSM, there’s hope that perhaps there are some ‘normal’ people who might be learning something positive about Palin that they never knew before. We’re not the target audience for these interviews.”
Yes, but what do the “normal” people outside the base think about this? That she is a fighter?? That she is a whiner? That is what is so frustrating. I want her to call out the media, but not at the expense of alienating people outside the base. Not that CNN is any gauge of the average voter, but just read the comments over there, 99% trashing of her...
99% of those who comment over there would trash Sarah if she said she likes kitties and rainbows. They're the same obots who infest YouTube, Digg and any other site that allows open comment. There is nothing she can say that won't draw these vile comments from the human debris that the media/democrat(ick) party incubates.
‘Yes, but what do the “normal” people outside the base think about this? That she is a fighter?? That she is a whiner? That is what is so frustrating. I want her to call out the media, but not at the expense of alienating people outside the base. Not that CNN is any gauge of the average voter, but just read the comments over there, 99% trashing of her...’
The folks who post at CNN are not ‘average’ anything. They’re die-hard Dems. Sarah could cure cancer and eliminate poverty from the face of the Earth and run against a Klansman and those folks still wouldn’t vote for her. As far as alienating ‘normal’ folks outside the base, Sarah hasn’t said anything out-of-bounds (IMO) that would cause the ‘average’ person to look at her in a bad way. Her family got trashed, she’s discussing it in a fair way, and anyone who can’t appreciate that SHOULD go post on the CNN site. :-)