Posted on 01/12/2009 3:26:44 PM PST by NormsRevenge
WASHINGTON A lawyer representing an Alaska gold mine urged the Supreme Court on Monday to uphold the mine owner's permit even though he acknowledged that the company's plan to dump metal waste into a nearby lake would kill all aquatic life.
But mining company lawyer Theodore Olson told justices that the waste is more accurately defined as "fill." And, after a decade or more of mining, he said, the lake could be restocked with no permanent harm to the environment.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
Coeur Alaska
http://www.kensingtongold.com/index.html
This mining operation wants to kill kittens!!! We must protest!!
I don't relish the idea of polluting the streams with the euphemistically described "fill" . . . why not turn the "fill" into an alternative energy source?
The solution the environmentalists wanted was a Pentagon sized mound of tailings visible by Cruise Ships from Lynn Canal. By the way of perspective downtown Juneau, is built on mine tailings ie. crushed rock. The oral arguments are posted already and make fascinating reading if you care what the liberal judges ie. Souter think. Somewhat scary actually.
Neither do I. The mining company should absorb the full cost of its operations. In fact, I believe this should have been the approach to 'environmentalism' by free-market advocates. In the absence of such an approach, we got horrendous government agencies.
...why not turn the "fill" into an alternative energy source?
What of gold mine waste is fuel?
LOL!!
You ever seen a rat nest? And the surrounding area? And I'm not talking about Congress....
Plenty of species "pollute" their own homes....then they up and move to new homes.
FWIW
Pigeons, and many others.
I take it you've never been to cattle pasture or barns.
Ever examine a bird's nest?
I didn't think so...
This lawsuit flows from mountaintop coal miners in WV disposing of overlay into ravines.
The enviros' lawsuits against the coal companies hinged on the Corp definition of "waste", which was different from from the EPA definition.
Clinton refused to change the Corp definition. Gore and Bush both campaigned on changing it. WV didn't believe Gore and went Bush, which put Bush over the top.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.