To: LibertyRocks; mlo
That reply was pure sarcasm to mlo, whom I consider a full-blown obot.
35 posted on
01/12/2009 10:03:57 AM PST by
Helen
To: Helen
LOL - yep, noticed that myself. :)
But, the post I was replying to was yours to Karibdes; the "lurking lawyer" who just happened to sign up to explain this to us, but conveniently just passed on false information...
I just didn't want you to take his post at face value. This case is far from over in regards to this announcement. I've read a bunch of posts, and the prevailing opinion by those who don't seem to have a pro-Obama agenda, is that SCOTUS just told Berg not to bypass the lower courts.
36 posted on
01/12/2009 10:16:08 AM PST by
LibertyRocks
( http://LibertyRocks.wordpress.com ~ Pro-Palin & NObama Gear : http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
To: Helen
"That reply was pure sarcasm to mlo, whom I consider a full-blown obot." Which you are also completely wrong about.
If you can just ignore what anyone says by putting a label on them then nobody can ever prove you wrong. Hey, that's pretty neat!
It's also a logical fallacy.
37 posted on
01/12/2009 10:37:59 AM PST by
mlo
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson