This site is pretty interesting showing both sides of the arguments http://www.iscid.org/boards/ubb-get_topic-f-6-t-000318-p-4.html
(And Demski’s site, uncommon descent is interesting too for both sides of argument if you read through the comments to the articles under hte article-)
I read Uncommon Descent nearly every day. That’s how I know how foolish much of the stuff said in the name of ID is. Including most of the stuff said on this thread.
I know, for example, that there is not a single instance of a calculation of CSI (complex specified information). Since that hypothetical calculation of probability is the cornerstone of intelligent design, I know that Phillip Johnson is correct to say that ID does not have a theory competitive with evolution.