I read Uncommon Descent nearly every day. That’s how I know how foolish much of the stuff said in the name of ID is. Including most of the stuff said on this thread.
I know, for example, that there is not a single instance of a calculation of CSI (complex specified information). Since that hypothetical calculation of probability is the cornerstone of intelligent design, I know that Phillip Johnson is correct to say that ID does not have a theory competitive with evolution.
[[I know, for example, that there is not a single instance of a calculation of CSI (complex specified information).]]
Not a single one eh? Hmmm- seems you just have a difference of opinion:
[[I know that Phillip Johnson is correct to say that ID does not have a theory competitive with evolution.]]
you’re welcoem to your opinion, but the facts show that it sure indeed does- Wehther you accept it or not is not relevent.