The phrase “nested hierarchy” is rather key to the understanding of evidence for evolution. If it isn’t obvious to you what this means, It would be good to look it up.
http://www.isss.org/hierarchy.htm
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evosite/lines/IVDhierarchies.shtml
http://www.toarchive.org/faqs/comdesc/section1.html
[[The phrase “nested hierarchy” is rather key to the understanding of evidence for evolution. If it isn’t obvious to you what this means, It would be good to look it up.]]
I know what nested hiearchy is suppsoed to indicate- however, where is the evidnece that hte heiarchy leaps speices kinds? I’m askign you why similarities must mean common descent Before we get on to why human engineered biology (or rather human modified) is, in your words, distinguishable from natural common descent biology- I’m askign you why Homological systems must mean common descent as opposed to common design-