Question: Is this presented as an argument that evolution is impossible, or that abiogenesis is impossible?
That both abiogenesis and materialistic evolution (proto-cell to man) is impossible.
Actually, that was a bit simplistic. It’s not just about what’s impossible. This thread is also about which theory (ID or Materialist Evolution) best fits the evidence. Here’s the affirmative again:
(A) All aspects of life (not just bacterial flagellums and blood clotting cascades) lie beyond the reach of naturalistic explanations, and (B) only intelligent design meets the criterion of an acceptable historical inference according to the Law of Cause and Effect.
[[Question: Is this presented as an argument that evolution is impossible, or that abiogenesis is impossible?]]
It is presented as an argument that naturalism is impossible, and can not account for what is discussed i nthe article