Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can cash crash?
Pittsburgh Tribune Review ^ | 1/11/2009 | John Browne

Posted on 01/11/2009 4:56:28 AM PST by markomalley

In the current recession, people are looking for safe places to put their money as a "store of value."

Treasury securities -- "treasuries" -- are direct government obligations offering interest and 24-hour liquidity. Insulating their owners from theft and bank failure, some regard treasuries as the safest form of cash. In 2008, there was a massive flight to the safety of treasuries. It was a year of bumper gains for those invested in them.

In 2009, however, treasuries are increasingly at risk of becoming the next asset bubble to burst.

Worse still, if the U.S. dollar is devalued as a result of increasingly massive deficits and foreign sales of treasuries, dollar cash could crash.

(snip)

The brunt of ridicule, old-timers often kept gold coins in shoeboxes under their beds. It might not be such a joke by 2010.

(Excerpt) Read more at pittsburghlive.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: cash; currency; deficit; financialcrisis; hyperinflation; obama; treasurybonds
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
More joyous news for a Sunday morning...
1 posted on 01/11/2009 4:56:29 AM PST by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Real property will hold the value of its true worth. Other than that, there are no totally safe investments.


2 posted on 01/11/2009 4:59:55 AM PST by SampleMan (Community Organizer: What liberals do when they run out of college, before they run out of Marxism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
The insane clown posse that is going to fully assuming power on January 20 does not understand a word of this article, and cannot be educated about it because they're blinded by ideology. What 0bama fails to understand is that the US government isn't where it was in the 1930's. We have LOT more debt than we did then, as do the states.

At some point, the ability and desire for others to loan capital for us to squander on "programs" diminishes to zero, for reasons outlined in the article. China is already saying they may not be inclined to buy much more US debt. At that point, it becomes an upside down flat spin (think aviation here) for the economy and the US government. Which is why I'm stocking up on cereal and ammunition.

3 posted on 01/11/2009 5:04:54 AM PST by Hardastarboard (Why do I find the Toyota "Saved by Zero" ads so ironic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Cash can, indeed, crash. See Zimbabwe. China is reaching the end of its financial rope as exports decline to the US. When that line is hit they will stop buying US bonds because they have no more resources with which to buy them. A little while after that China will have to begin selling off the dollars it already has in order to continue to operate. That will gain China little as the current market value of those dollars will collapse as they flood into the market at which point the Chinese economy goes from “slowdown” to collapse and the US economy gets a dose of sudden Weimar.


4 posted on 01/11/2009 5:14:37 AM PST by arthurus ( H.L. Mencken said, "Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard

http://market-ticker.denninger.net/archives/722-Obama-You-Need-To-Fire-Everyone.html

Be very afraid of this guy.


5 posted on 01/11/2009 5:17:55 AM PST by misterrob (Smooth talkers win at singles bars and in politics .. often with similar outcomes for the listener)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Eventually the public will find out why Treasury was so busy the last couple of years printing enormous quantities of new currency.
6 posted on 01/11/2009 5:25:29 AM PST by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard
I believe that at least a portion of the incoming crew does understand but Ayers et al also understand that a collapsing economy is the shortest route to socialism and total control. Once they have that they don't have to give it up again, especially if they get Amnesty past us. FDR didn't get socialism as complete as he would have liked but he started with the government only being a tiny part of the economy and of the social system before 1932. He boosted government tremendously but it is all relative. If Hussein succeeds in increasing the government at the same rate that FDR did there will not be much left at all and the remnant will be sucked up later because it will have not any longer have the free market base on which to thrive. Remember, this crew is the closest thing we have had to doctrinaire socialists since Henry Wallace.
7 posted on 01/11/2009 5:25:41 AM PST by arthurus ( H.L. Mencken said, "Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

Yes but what is the real value of property? Property that can provide food has value and a house on a piece of property has value. Beyond that property values become as shaky as any other investment.

Farm land itself, once you strip away government participation, has about the same security as commodity prices, but commodity prices are some of the most volatile investments known. Land does not react as fast as commodity prices, but its value can soar and bust just like any other investment.

Rental real estate in many ways is worse. Its worth is controlled by externalities (does a local factory close etc).

Property also requires a functioning state to maintain your rights to the property. Absent that it requires enough folks with guns capable of keeping civil order and preserving property rights in your area.

Unfortunately land is not portable (unlike for example diamonds) and it is subject to the whims of the state. Lots of folks in the world have found out their ownership rights are meaningless. The state does not even have to directly seize it, they can rig the property tax code to take the land away from you in slow motion.

A dying state looks to find cash to keep going anyplace that it can.

Real goods which you need have value (food, clothes, energy such as coal or heating oil, transportation, and guns which can provide food and defense).

I don’t see how land is a less risking investment than, lets say, Treasury Inflation Protected Securities. In both cases you are relying on the state to continue functioning in some rational fashion. While you can have the inflation rate gamed by the state, it has served as a surrogate for the inflation rate quite well in the past. Otherwise you are assured of a modest real return on your investment (3%).


8 posted on 01/11/2009 5:27:02 AM PST by exhaustguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

In addition, by selling dollars for renminbi (Chinese currency) they will be increasing the value of the renminbi and consequently hurting their exporting business, which is very important to China.


9 posted on 01/11/2009 5:43:28 AM PST by cowtowney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: exhaustguy
Yes but what is the real value of property? Property that can provide food has value and a house on a piece of property has value. Beyond that property values become as shaky as any other investment.

Correct. You defined property's real value fairly well. But remember, land is not the only property that has value.

I don’t see how land is a less risking investment than, lets say, Treasury Inflation Protected Securities. In both cases you are relying on the state to continue functioning in some rational fashion. While you can have the inflation rate gamed by the state, it has served as a surrogate for the inflation rate quite well in the past. Otherwise you are assured of a modest real return on your investment (3%).

At what point in history has land been worthless? Never. Of course your point about the rule of law or greater strength being required to maintain it is true, but that applies to everything. The plus of land over treasuries is that you only require the rule of law, not a solvent government.

Hyper-inflation leads to bartering, because as I said, real things have real value.

10 posted on 01/11/2009 5:46:40 AM PST by SampleMan (Community Organizer: What liberals do when they run out of college, before they run out of Marxism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Hmmm.. maybe we should ask someone who might know - someone get Zimbabwe on the phone please...


11 posted on 01/11/2009 5:49:50 AM PST by TheBattman (Pray for our country....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

another msm article pushes gold. that usually means it’s sell time


12 posted on 01/11/2009 5:50:44 AM PST by chuck_the_tv_out
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

In the early 80’s, Reagan warned of an enormous deficit, which I believe was $30 billion at the time. Now we are talking trillions. How is that different from Zimbabwe?


13 posted on 01/11/2009 5:58:14 AM PST by Glenn (Free Venezuela!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

This house in Detroit was built for hundreds and hundreds of years. Now look at it. What killed it, and its city? Politics.

Be very afraid.

14 posted on 01/11/2009 6:20:09 AM PST by Leisler (It is always said it is for the children. (Not your children..others...somewhere))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Leisler

That sucks. What a beautiful structure it was.


15 posted on 01/11/2009 6:43:48 AM PST by mefistofelerevised
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard

“the insane clown posse”

that about covers it.

create money out of thin air, criminalize the owning of property or money, play around with the election process and say it’s for the good of the country, say the constitution is a living breathing document.

really cool.

IMHO


16 posted on 01/11/2009 6:47:42 AM PST by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Relax.

America is precisely one week, from an historic economic recovery.

No, I’m not joking, and that’s not sarcasm. The mess we’re in is *entirely* a problem of public confidence. It’s media created, and the media will be working 24/7 to spin an “0bama recovery” from day one.

Not that a recovery is a bad thing. Unlike liberals, this poster does not want America to lose wars or crash economies, for partisan political gain.

Besides, 0bama will be simple enough to defeat next time around. He’ll make Jimmy Carter look like an intelligent leader by that time.

The economy though, will improve.

Given the amount of compression built into the oversold conditions right now, it could be quite spectacular.


17 posted on 01/11/2009 6:49:57 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (During any "D" administration: USA's MSM, become indistinguishable from the USSR's Pravda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cowtowney
by selling dollars for renminbi (Chinese currency) they will be increasing the value of the renminbi etc.

That is just saying the same thing from the other end.

18 posted on 01/11/2009 6:50:49 AM PST by arthurus ( H.L. Mencken said, "Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan
Real property will hold the value of its true worth. Other than that, there are no totally safe investments.

What is true worth? Government can rezone it, government can tax it, sometimes punishingly. Government can seize it to give to someone they think is more worthy. Government can destroy the value. What's the real value of a house in Detroit? The average selling price for houses in Detroit is $18,000. Is that the "true worth" of that house? Probably now, but so was the $100,000 plus someone paid for it 30 years ago. It doesn't seem to have held its value very well.

19 posted on 01/11/2009 6:52:40 AM PST by Jack Black (ping can't be a tag line, can it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

liberals constantly speak about equality and economic justice and economic morality.

they now have conditions whereby they can erode the dollar so that everyone will be equal; everyone will have nothing and therefore be the same.

to those who voted for the this crop of foul-mouthed socialists, it is hoped that you and you alone bear the fruits of their irresponsibility.

IMHO


20 posted on 01/11/2009 7:00:21 AM PST by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson