Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Harry Reid’s Land Grab
townhall.com ^ | 01/10/09 | Amanda Carpenter

Posted on 01/10/2009 10:02:37 AM PST by TornadoAlley3

It’s hard to pinpoint the worst part of the public lands legislation bill Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is calling up for an under-the-radar Sunday tomorrow.

The 1200-page, pork-laden, $10 billion proposal locks up millions of acres of energy-rich property by designating it an environmentalist-friendly “federal wilderness” area where not even as much as a bicycle would be permitted to travel across the land. Many of these areas recently became available when the ban on domestic drilling in Western states expired last fall and the liberal left couldn’t muster the courage to keep it in place due to rising energy prices.

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: grab; harryreid; land
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 01/10/2009 10:02:38 AM PST by TornadoAlley3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Reid is making the land grab a priority and is calling members of the Senate back to Washington on Sunday to rush it through. And the bill, which is basically an omnibus compilation of pet projects, land seizures sponsored by individual House members and senators, has wide-ranging, bipartisan support since it helps many of them secure support from stakeholders in their home states and districts.


2 posted on 01/10/2009 10:04:22 AM PST by TornadoAlley3 (Obama is everything Oklahoma is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

No the ban will be lifted when Reid is ready to make a few more $ and when he has finished purchasing all of this land he wants.


3 posted on 01/10/2009 10:06:06 AM PST by nbhunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Pay no attention to what is happening in the right hand, just watch what is happening in the left hand.


4 posted on 01/10/2009 10:08:40 AM PST by Erik Latranyi (Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

There is no money for a land grab.


5 posted on 01/10/2009 10:09:42 AM PST by Eva (CHANGE- the post modern euphemism for Marxist revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nbhunt

Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla. has pledged to filibuster. He says the spending in the bill is excessive — nearly $4 billion over five years — and that the measure calls for removing millions of acres of federal property from oil and gas development.


6 posted on 01/10/2009 10:09:42 AM PST by TornadoAlley3 (Obama is everything Oklahoma is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allerious; ...
Federal Land Grab Alert



Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!
7 posted on 01/10/2009 10:09:43 AM PST by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3
We have at least four years of this to look forward to.

Liberals pushing their pet projects, spending our money and getting what they want.

It's going o be a long four years...

8 posted on 01/10/2009 10:10:21 AM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3
The lands bill chief opponent Republican Sen. Tom Coburn (Okla.) argues it’s foolish to add acreage to the federal government’s responsibility when it can’t even properly manage treasured properties like the Statue of Liberty or National Mall appropriately.

Thank you, Senator Coburn!

At least we know we have one true friend of the tax-payer in Washington.

(We just need 99 more.)

9 posted on 01/10/2009 10:10:21 AM PST by Flycatcher (Strong copy for a strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3
Harry Reid’s Land Grab

Barney Frank's butt grab...


10 posted on 01/10/2009 10:12:10 AM PST by ETL (Smoking gun evidence on ALL the ObamaRat-commie connections at my newly revised FR Home/About page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Are we surprised that the socialists want to control everything possible so they limit the space to exercize freedom?

Making more places off limits to private citizens gives freedom fighters fewer places to operate from safely.


11 posted on 01/10/2009 10:16:24 AM PST by o_zarkman44 (Since when is paying more, but getting less, considered Patriotic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44

When the crunch time comes,freedom fighters will operate anywhere they want.


12 posted on 01/10/2009 10:21:53 AM PST by Farmer Dean (168 grains of instant conflict resolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

1200 pages of LibTard ideology brought home to roost...made real by the shallow Hal of the Senate, Harry Screed.

Just another chapter in the march toward socialism.

Lock and Load.


13 posted on 01/10/2009 10:23:54 AM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3
This puke should be in prison, not stealing land for special interests through the senate. Strange, but I don't see any change coming, except for the reconstitution of the Clinton Crime Syndicate.
14 posted on 01/10/2009 10:26:22 AM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (The committed will surely dominate the complacent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PubliusMM

BLOAT.


15 posted on 01/10/2009 10:28:35 AM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (The committed will surely dominate the complacent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: okie01
We have at least four years of this to look forward to. Liberals pushing their pet projects, spending our money and getting what they want.

But the important thing is we taught them RINOs a lesson.

16 posted on 01/10/2009 10:30:35 AM PST by oldbrowser (Break up the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: oldbrowser
But the important thing is we taught them RINOs a lesson.

You sound like my wife, who is resolutely unwilling to cut any slack for the estimated 7 million Republican voters who came out for Bush in 2004, but failed to show up for McCain in '08.

While I voted for McCain -- even while believing that a McCain administration had the potential to be disastrous for the country (and, thus, the party) -- I also believed that an Obama administration was a certain catastrophe for all concerned. Some choice, huh? Far worse than Ford-Carter, in my opinion.

I recognize, though, why a good number of conservative voters wouldn't come out for McCain. Given a party that has repeatedly insulted its base -- with bogus campaign finance reform infringing on free speech, with amnesty diluting national sovereignty and discounting citizenship, with out-of-control spending -- it was perfectly understandable that many conservatives would say "enough".

If a party wants a person's vote, they're obligated to offer a platform that one can favor (on balance) -- and,given power, to govern accordingly. It's a proven marketing principle. And, certainly, a marketer is advised not to insult his best customers at the same time they ask for his business.

But the GOP chose another direction and, in many respects, deserved exactly what it got.

Not that this will make the next four years any easier. At the same time, we'll have to see if the GOP learned any lessons from this experience.

17 posted on 01/10/2009 10:57:02 AM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Good for Coburn (as usual). At least if his dandrufy-ness pulls this one off, he won’t be able to do it under the cover of darkness. Which will make for political gain and maybe make it easier to fix later.


18 posted on 01/10/2009 11:00:15 AM PST by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

What do we do to stop this?


19 posted on 01/10/2009 11:10:42 AM PST by Chgogal (Don't look at me. You elected them, Comrade!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Ugh! Five years ago I left California in search of the American dream. With this turd being from my state, it looks I went from California to California-lite!


20 posted on 01/10/2009 11:16:05 AM PST by NV Lawdog (I'd rather be judged by twelve, than carried by six.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson