Replies

NOW..., this is the question that pertains to you and some other FReepers, mainly. It’s precisely these types of discussions where there is no evidence,
***That is a complete, utter, blatant and massive disregard for the evidence, so much so that it is tantamount to being a troll. Sure, hyperbole is allowed, but we see it time and again, “no evidence” when it’s freeping obvious that there is plenty of evidence or these cases wouldn’t have gotten this far. My analysis showed a 1 in 70Billion chance that this stuff could have lined up this way.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2162033/posts?page=687#687
How is that NO evidence, or evidence of a tinfoil hat conspiracy theory, or that this issue reflects negatively on Free Republic? It isn’t. But your alien abduction garbage was openly mocked and disproven by CSICOP when they sent in their own person to get interviewed by Mack and she held up by him as one of the most compelling examples of the phenomena.

where even President Bush, himself, has refused to prosecute because he has seen there is no evidence of a problem, where our own leaders don’t go down this track, because they know that there’s nothing there —
***I see threads where Campos and Ramean — the two INS Agents who were imprisoned for firing on a drug dealing illegal alien— should have been pardoned by Bush, the evidence appears to be overwhelming yet he gets it wrong. Why would Bush want to intervene here when it’s clearly the SCOTUS’s job? It does not appear at all to be his job to prosecute on eligibility of the opposing party’s candidate for president.

it’s all this — that *actually* gives “cannon fodder” to outsiders...
***If any of your arguments would withstand even the slightest scrutiny, maybe your conclusion would bear some weight. But you constantly pull classic fallacies and blatant misrepresentations out of your quiver of reason and so your position is subject to just as much scrutiny. It is my position that someone who thinks Alien Abductions are legitimate scientific endeavor are exactly the kind of people who give cannon fodder to outsiders. It is the a huge sign of hypocrisy for such a person to base his sniping on certifiGate threads on this ridiculous posture that it somehow reflects negatively on Free Republic.

I would think that someone who says (like I do, too...)
“Let create a state law that vets Presidential Candidate properly, and we’ve got one bill going in Oklahoma right now” — is a statement that is *rational*.
***Sure, that’s rational and I’ve even encouraged you in that effort. But it is irrational to think that your effort makes FR look good while ours makes FR look bad. It’s a logical fallacy of assuming mutual exclusivity. Our effort has the potential to knock out the President Elect. TOMORROW. Your effort has the potential to... possibly work in 4 years... after Obama’s damage has been done to the constitution... assuming the democratic controlled congress doesn’t outmaneuver you.

Now, between the idea that all the conservative media outlets, all the Republican leaders, even the Supreme Court, and also the Electoral College, and even Vice President Cheney — want to do nothing to challenge Obama — *that* is definitely cannon fodder — to be sure...
***They’re relying upon the SCOTUS to do their job. And it IS their job.

So, if I were you — I would reduce the cannon fodder that you’re giving to others — that can be used against Free Republic.... (that is..., if you’re really concerned about cannon fodder).
***I’m not that concerned, but you seem to be. Where is your concern about cannon fodder when it comes to advocating Alien Abuctions as a new religion, or whatever is being advocated here :
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2165412/posts?page=13#13
Kevmo: “So now there’s an alien abduction caucus? It is becoming a religion?”
Star Traveler: There’s no doubt about it. ... It’s a good topic to go over..., without a doubt...

—

However, as far as I’m concerned ... I *do know* that liberals who are against God in our country and want to remove God from everything and don’t want morals from what God says or our Christian heritage here in this country — yes — they *will use* any references to the Bible and/or Jesus’ sayings, and/or any idea that one presents about Creation — all as cannon fodder. That *is* a given — because they are fools, those who deny our Creator God. So, that’s too bad for them.
***Nothing really controversial here, for this Pro-God forum.

However, on your part, I don’t see the real basis for what you’re saying and doing — since I have seen no legal and court evidence to back up anything that you’ve said.
***Again you’re back to the NO evidence thing. It is a hyperbolic straw argument, the argument of a CoLB troll.

I see only *strong opinion* — so strong that anyone who disagrees with you is a “troll” or a “disruptor” or whatever other name comes up at the moment ...
***I disagree with plenty of others on the CoLB topics without calling them a troll. Your own argumentation even on this one post is evidence of trollhood.