[mlo]

"...Do you think 0bama has demonstrated that he is Constitutionally eligible by even the most inclusive of interpretations (not including possibly Photoshopped electronic images), or does it just not matter to you?"

Let me ask. If you can simply declare any documentation a forgery, is it even possible for Obama to prove anything to your satisfaction?

[ml/nj]

is it even possible for Obama to prove anything to your satisfaction?

You again!

Yes, of course it is possible. For me, all 0bama would have to do is waive any right to privacy and direct the State of Hawaii to send certified (raised seal) copies of his original birth certificate to anyone who pays whatever the State's going fee is. So long as those certificates (mailed to several interested people) were all the same, raised no questions from people who have testified in court as experts in document authentication, and showed that he was born in Hawaii, I would be okay with it. I don't think the Framers would be okay with it, but I would.

Tell me I'm being unreasonable.

ML/NJ

[AmericanVictory]

You seem to be ignoring the fact that the document presented by Obama and his camp is not what has been termed the “long form” or actual birth certificate.

The question of alteration of the document is not the same as the question of there being two documents, of which only one, whose confidentiality is protected by law absent authorization from the person whose actual birth certificate it is.