It is interesting to me how this supposed man of science can deride believers in a God created world, but claims to find great enlightenment in the silly myths of a defeated neolithic people.
Isn’t the consistent scientific mind impressive?
You clearly have misunderstood the reason I used to post the Native American creation stories.
Perhaps if you went back and checked the context of those posts you would acquire a better understanding of the reasons behind my posts.
And "beating my chest" is not a very accurate description of my posts. I realize you may disagree with what I say, but if you wish to practice science your role is to provide evidence to the contrary. (Empty rhetoric does not substitute for evidence.)
You wrote:
“You clearly have misunderstood the reason I used to post the Native American creation stories.”
Nope. I just think you’ll change your story now to fit what works best.
“Perhaps if you went back and checked the context of those posts you would acquire a better understanding of the reasons behind my posts.”
Perhaps if you didn’t rely on neolithic myths about rangy undomesticated near-dogs for enlightenment you might not spout knee-jerk responses to posts about creation.
“And “beating my chest” is not a very accurate description of my posts.”
Oh, no? Let’s see:
“Bring scientific evidence, not religious apologetics, and you’ll do better. (If you have any.)”
What’s that I hear? Thump, thump, thump goes your fist against your breast?
How about...
“So don’t give us any ... nonsense. One side is doing science and the other is doing religious apologetics.”
Thump, thump, thump...
“You believe anything those lying creationist websites feed you, but you deny science, which produces evidence to back up what it claims. What a joke.”
Thump, thump, thump...
“I realize you may disagree with what I say, but if you wish to practice science your role is to provide evidence to the contrary.”
I am here merely to listen to you thump your chest while you fantasize...er...meditate on coyotes and their oh so important teachings to defeated third-world style peoples.
“(Empty rhetoric does not substitute for evidence.)”
And reliance on Indian myths is no substitute for common sense and the Western canon.