Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In Job Search, Ex-cons Find Questions Linger
JSOnline ^ | January 7, 2009 | Eugene Kane

Posted on 01/09/2009 5:51:18 PM PST by Diana in Wisconsin

AP News item - "Hoping to prevent convicts from being shut out of the work force, some major U.S. cities are eliminating questions from their job applications that ask whether prospective employees have ever been convicted of a crime."

When most people fill out a job application, the main concern usually is whether they can make themselves seem impressive enough to get the job. But when you have a criminal record, it's all about getting a fair shake when they know you've made a serious mistake.

In many ways, it's a leap of faith.

Ask any ex-con looking for work in Milwaukee, particularly African-American men with criminal records that involve drug-dealing or other non-violent felonies. For many, their past mistakes continue to haunt them.

"I just can't catch a break!" is what one out-of-work convict once told me about his fruitless job search. He blamed his criminal record; once employers knew about it, he never heard from them again.

That's why it was intriguing to learn that several cities - including Chicago, Boston, Minneapolis, Baltimore and San Francisco - have eliminated questions about criminal records from job applications. The motivation for the new policy came out of a desire to aid convicts who feel shut out of the job market and reduce the likelihood they will commit new crimes.

In most cases, eliminating the question from the application didn't mean the city stopped doing background checks, particularly in sensitive areas involving working with children or public safety. But it acknowledges it's not necessary to inquire about criminal convictions for jobs that have nothing to do with a previous offense.

This strikes me as something Milwaukee should consider, particularly since this is a city where a 2003 study found that whites with criminal records were called back for possible jobs more often than African-Americans with no criminal record.

Milwaukee Employee Relations Director Maria Monteagudo said the city asks all applicants to list their misdemeanor and felony convictions on job applications but not municipal citations. She also cited a state law that forbids any discrimination against applicants because of previous arrests or convictions.

"It's illegal to use that against someone," she said.

Monteagudo said some people don't understand the failure to list a criminal record on applications can be used as a reason to remove them from job consideration. Even if they believe listing their record will be a negative factor, they are still required to provide the information or face being accused of lying about their background.

Monteagudo said she felt that eliminating the criminal record disclosure portion on job applications could benefit some ex-offenders but it could also raise false hopes for others. Some might not understand that providing false information might be the thing that killed their chances.

One of Milwaukee's most daunting problems is the underutilization of black men with criminal records in the work force. In some cases, a criminal record might be relevant, but there are plenty of jobs where having run afoul of the law in a previous life shouldn't be considered grounds for denial.

Paying your debt to society should mean just that, paid in full.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: excons; workplace

1 posted on 01/09/2009 5:51:19 PM PST by Diana in Wisconsin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

When 80% end up back in prison, should we really care? Don’t put the blame on industry in this country.


2 posted on 01/09/2009 5:54:48 PM PST by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
That's why it was intriguing to learn that several cities - including Chicago, Boston, Minneapolis, Baltimore and San Francisco - have eliminated questions about criminal records from job applications. The motivation for the new policy came out of a desire to aid convicts who feel shut out of the job market and reduce the likelihood they will commit new crimes.

Yes, why would we want to screen risky applicants from jobs that most likely involve the public's personal information.

3 posted on 01/09/2009 5:55:01 PM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

If you’re applying at a novelty license plate factory, it would be a plus.


4 posted on 01/09/2009 6:03:56 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet ("Don't confuse what you got a right to do with what's right to do." Bill Bennett)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit
I'll take you one further and say I think we should deny all convicted felons any employment whatsoever for the rest of their lives.

That includes Chuck Colson.

/ sarc -- or maybe not

5 posted on 01/09/2009 6:12:21 PM PST by Clint Williams (Read Roto-Reuters -- we're the spinmeisters | Impeach Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Clint Williams
I'll take you one further and say I think we should deny all convicted felons any employment whatsoever for the rest of their lives.

Fine, if you want to keep them incarcerated for the rest of their lives. Otherwise you are FORCING someone to commit crimes just to feed/house themselves.

Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. Great! But, once the time is done, the punishment should be done too.

6 posted on 01/09/2009 6:26:53 PM PST by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit
>>Yes, why would we want to screen risky applicants from jobs
>>that most likely involve the public's personal information.
 
The public's personal information?
Inmate laborers now do everything from processing your credit card statements to making your airline reservations, to assembling your tennis shoes and the circuit boards for your stereo. And the Department of Justice operates something called Federal Prison Industries, better known as Unicor, as a profit-making venture to benefit American corporations. Unicor runs more than 100 factories in prisons in at least 30 states
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Federal_Prison_Industries
They already get that while still IN prison.
 

7 posted on 01/09/2009 6:55:25 PM PST by LomanBill (A bird flies because the right wing opposes the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson