Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Editorial: CalPERS made a bet – and lost
Sacramento Bee ^ | Jan. 06, 2009

Posted on 01/09/2009 3:19:14 PM PST by george76

CalPERS has sustained steep declines in the value of its real estate holdings on top of even larger stock market losses.

CalPERS made aggressive investments in real estate at the worst possible time, when inflated property values had peaked and were already beginning to decline.

The magnitude of the losses almost ensures that CalPERS will raise employer contribution rates.

Pension fund officials have warned state and local governments that they may be hit with fee increases of between 2 percent and 5 percent of payroll beginning as early as 2010. If the recession deepens and sales and property taxes continue to fall, that will be a very difficult burden for governments to bear.

While CalPERs can be faulted for what in hindsight appears to be imprudent investment decisions, state and local elected officials must bear some part of the blame for the higher pension costs.

In recent years... cities, counties, special districts and the state have approved lavish retirement benefits. When investment returns falter, the burden of paying those benefits shifts to government employers – that is, to taxpayers.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: burkle; calpers; ronburkle; taxes; taxpayers; yucaipa
If you think the Madoff Ponzi scandal is the last bullet in that gun, Iv'e got a bridge ...

ht comments

1 posted on 01/09/2009 3:19:14 PM PST by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: george76
Don't cry for me Kalifornia

Total CalPERS Fund
Market Value

$183.9 Billion

Reflects market value, as of market close on 01/08/09.

View By Asset Class >>

2 posted on 01/09/2009 3:24:25 PM PST by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
Ooops, asset class did not link:

Current Investment Fund Values

Reflects market value, as of market close on: 01/08/09.*

Total Market Value $183.9 Billion
Breakdown by Asset Class
Total Value
($ Billion)
Total Global Equity Fund Market Value $76.0
Total Global Fixed Income Fund Market Value $59.5
Total AIM (Private Equity) Fund Market Value** $24.0
Total Real Estate Fund Market Value** $20.8
Total Inflation Linked (Pilot Program) Fund Market Value** $3.6

3 posted on 01/09/2009 3:25:45 PM PST by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

CALPERS back in the Reagan era was strong on shareholders rights. More recently it has become a union & liberal slush fund with money doled out in investments for Burkle and Sean Puffy Combs ventures.

My guess is Madoff’s ponzi scheme had more oversight.


4 posted on 01/09/2009 3:25:56 PM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Clearly, they just need a bailout.


5 posted on 01/09/2009 3:37:54 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (Most Animals protect their babies. Palestinians kill their babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

You play with fire you are going to get burned sooner are later!! Fools!!


6 posted on 01/09/2009 3:39:19 PM PST by org.whodat (Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts for Super-Rich Bankers! Republicans do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie
We should all ask for a bailout to leave CA. There is a job gone wanting in TX because only a few can do it. And there are aerospace contracts that need to be worked on.

I'll ask for $300k to move. Spend a week at the Bellagio in Vegas like a Roman Field Marshal playing craps. Eat the most exotic foods I can find. Maybe a woman in the mix at some point. And come out ahead for that long drive south.

7 posted on 01/09/2009 5:16:24 PM PST by BobS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: george76
CalPERS made aggressive investments in real estate at the worst possible time

I would like to know, who's property they bought?

8 posted on 01/09/2009 7:15:33 PM PST by razorback-bert (Save the planet...it is the only known one with beer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

You are right about Calpers being strong on shareholder rights. But I think they still are. As an active investor, I rely on their web sites to make proxy voting decisions.


9 posted on 01/09/2009 7:23:26 PM PST by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert

one CalPERS real estate misstep stands out in particular. In February 2007, CalPERS invested $922 million in a deal with LandSource Communities Development LLC that involved thousands of homes and lots in seven states including Florida, Arizona and California.

Sixteen months later, LandSource filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy... CalPERS could lose its entire investment, nearly $1 billion.


10 posted on 01/09/2009 7:59:17 PM PST by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

Yes and no. This is all a legacy of the 1980s CALPERS. Today they have money going to cronies with investments with crony firms etc. I would guess in the private equity side and the real estate side. It is a lib and union slush fund these days.


11 posted on 01/09/2009 8:29:49 PM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: george76
Isn't investing always a risk?

Just trying to grasp what all the B&Ming is about, regarding “investment losses”.

None of those “investors” gave a damn about the artificial inflation of rental rates and market values for new homebuyers, after they started “heavily investing” in the real estate market.

Am I supposed to care that the same greedy herd mentality investors who caused an economic meltdown, are now hurting as a result? Give me a break!

I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess these same funds managers were devastated by the dotcom bust.
You remember...those people and “funds” who invested big money in “businesses” that had no product sales,no plans to sell any product,(other than advertising) and whose only income was from “investments”.

Sheesh!

12 posted on 01/09/2009 10:46:57 PM PST by sarasmom (Buyers Remorse Date : Place your bets ladies and gentlemen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson