Posted on 01/09/2009 5:33:23 AM PST by Red in Blue PA
Edited on 01/09/2009 5:38:11 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
WASHINGTON (AP)
(Excerpt) Read more at mcall.com ...
Of course they aren’t even quoting Palin fully, to make her sound like a sour whining grape. Her actual remarks are very strong. She said, she didn’t mind them attacking her... but the insults and smears towards her children.
Sarah Palin says CBS News anchor Katie Couric and comic actress Tina Fey have been “exploiting” her.
A lot of us recognized the “exploitation” or abuse or whatever you call it, when it was occurring. Palin would have been well served to follow Cheney’s lead rather than mclame’s.
I am a Sarahcuda supporter, but did the lady just now figure out the “exploitation”? Or has mclame had some control over her beyond the failed election and she can just now fight back?
Yeah, agree. Let's do compare Sarah Palin to Caroline Kennedy. Let's start with experience; Palin has executive experience as a mayor and governor. Kennedy has experience as being a rich, spoiled brat. Ability to articulate; Palin can speaks with a middle America accent and with grace and dignity and can speak for hours without saying “uhh” or “you know” once. Kennedy, on the other hand; speaks with the grating accent of the northeast and by some counts said “you know” 196 times in a recent interview. Palin is a graduate of the University of Idaho while Kennedy is a graduate of Harvard and Columbia. Personally, it's easy for me to see who received the better education...
Watch the interview excerpts at http://www.howobamagotelected.com .
Palin says the McCain campaign handlers pushed her into interviews she knew weren’t going well. It’s also clear that the McCain campaign tried to push Palin into the McMold... they should have let Palin be Palin.
Kennedy is a crowned silk collar elitist princess/feudal snob who got everything shoved in her... forget it.
Right, and AP, which was part of the original smear,is at it again.
That said, I’m glad Sarah is taking them on. The old argument was never attack the press because they buy ink by the barrel. Their ink is now bought on credit and their credit scores are sinking fast.
When Olberman reported this story last night I had to turn off the TV for fear of getting some of the venom on me that he was dripping. I thought he might have a stroke (not that that is bad...). Boy, do they ever hate her.
Sarah is coming forward now with this as the election is over and a President not named McAmnesty takes over....no problem with her holding back from earlier...
Thank you for that excellent observation.
After the interview with John Ziegler, he showed Sarah one of his DVD’s. She spotted Olberman on the case saying “That guy is evil!”
All out war now between Keith and Sarah. Battle royal to come.
Have you seen the interview with Ziegler? She isn’t whining at all. http://www.howobamagotelected.com
Taking a stance is better than just taking hits. Just ask Bush how “smart” his meek silence towards the press was...
Imagine if Sarah Palin had an interview with the litany of “like you know’s” that Caroline Kennedy spouted?
Sarah is not destroyed. Some of these newspapers will be long gone before Sarah is.
No, the MSM hates her because she is definitely not one of them or a corrupt pol, and she WILL upset their little apple cart. They know it.
And because the GOP was silent during the attacks on her before and after the election, the GOP can go to blazes.
Right now, Mitch McConnell is wetting his pants over working with Hussein to tank our economy once and for all.
Anyone who criticizes Sarah Palin with regard to the outrageous media treatment she and her family endured, is no conservative. Your an elite media/left wing butt-kisser.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.