Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cothrige
I have to say, this is the pièce de résistance. Just how wonderfully you point out that you don't actually read what people write to discover that they are bigots.

It's easy to see how you could miss the point from your pedestal. The view must be breathtaking though

"’The civilized world must win this fight,’ the editors thunder. But, if it comes to war, it will not be the ‘civilized world’ humping up that bloody road to Baghdad; it will be American kids with names like McAllister, Murphy, Gonzales, and Leroy Brown." - Washington Times, August 29, 1990

In other words, Jews aren't invested in their own self preservation. Only red-blooded Americans who have no business helping Israel via proxy in the Middle East... I had forgotten that our defense of Israel is America's only horse in that race

1990: "There are only two groups that are beating the drums for war in The Middle East – the Israeli Defense Ministry and its amen corner in the United States." - The McLaughlin Group, Aug 26, 1990

The only factions in the US who want resolution through military supremacy are church-going Evangelical sycophants or Israeli war-mongering lobbyists. Does Pat understand Islam will keep knocking our on door whether we're Isolationist or not?

"Those of us in childhood during the war years were introduced to Hitler only as a caricature…Though Hitler was indeed racist and anti-Semitic to the core, a man who without compunction could commit murder and genocide, he was also an individual of great courage, a soldier’s soldier in the Great War, a leader steeped in the history of Europe, who possessed oratorical powers that could awe even those who despised him. But Hitler’s success was not based on his extraordinary gifts alone. His genius was an intuitive sense of the mushiness, the character flaws, the weakness masquerading as morality that was in the hearts of the statesmen who stood in his path." - St. Louis Globe – Democrat, Aug 25, 1977

Who is this Hitler he speaks of? I mean, sure... he was a touch on the genocidal side... even anti-Semitic, BUT MY GOD HIS ORATORY! And oh, how he could marshal those Nazis. Let's not forget his unflagging courage. I mean, hell, the guy knew the whole world would want a shot at him and yet he killed all those Jews, Gypsies, Poles, British, French, Russians, Americans, Africans and Germans anyway. Whoever he is, someone make a plaque or something... Just, wow. The AFC agrees completely

"After World War II, Jewish influence over foreign policy became almost an obsession with American leaders." - A Republic, Not an Empire. P. 336.

Yes, we all know what "friends" Brzezinski and Kissinger have been towards Israeli interests and their statehood. But maybe he didn't mean them... he probably meant the other Jews controlling America as our leaders fawned over their consul. Maybe he was referring to the UN? Always standing steadfast with the Jews...

"Even if his veto of the (loan) guarantees is overridden, he will have won high marks for his courage, and exposed congress for what it has become, a Parliament of Whores incapable of standing up for U.S. national interests, if AIPAC is on the other end of the line." - Syndicated column, December 18, 1991

That damn AIPAC. Sometimes I forget, are they the only lobbyists in Washington? If you paid attention to Buchanan, you might come to that conclusion

If you fail to back Israel in my eyes, you are an anti-Semite. Their statehood is a sacred thing, and America will be woefully mistaken should they ever forget this. Buchanan's latest charge that the defense of their country is over-reaching and on par with a "blitzkrieg" is the only evidence anyone should ever need to know exactly how he feels about them. What exactly are you STILL missing here? His statements reek of the Peace Now activists in Israel and elsewhere: the pinnacle of capitulation and cowardice... is your membership still active?

98 posted on 01/11/2009 9:11:32 PM PST by swordfishtrombone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]


To: swordfishtrombone
Well, there you go again. More quotes, some of them up for another round. And yet, not even one is antisemitic. Nothing at all. And still you insist that in the absolute and total absence of antisemitism we can be certain of antisemitism. Funny, I wonder how many quotes I can dredge up by you which don't evince your interest in paederasty.
If you fail to back Israel in my eyes, you are an anti-Semite.

And if you insist on equating not supporting Israel and antisemitism then you are an imbecile. Perhaps you might give some though to actually learning what words mean before you try using them. Antisemitism has as much to do with "backing" the actions of a particular nation as you have with intelligence. They are completely unrelated. Pretending they are the same does not mean that you get to go around accusing people of bigotry. That is called lying. There is another word you would do well to learn something about.

What exactly are you STILL missing here? His statements reek of the Peace Now activists in Israel and elsewhere: the pinnacle of capitulation and cowardice... is your membership still active?

I will tell you what is missing here. Substance to back up your lies. Proof. Evidence. That is what is missing. You have libeled people, and when called on it you cast sin before sin. You are worse than what you would decry.

99 posted on 01/11/2009 10:57:11 PM PST by cothrige (Ego vero Evangelio non crederem, ni si me catholicae Ecclesiae commoveret auctoritas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson