I hope you realize why being argumentative is a waste of time, and quite frankly, incredibly annoying. He was not ruled as a natural born citizen.
This makes no sense. You are trying to use the fact that they made no distinction as proof that a distinction exists. They ruled he was a citizen at birth. They wouldn't have had to use some other term for the same thing.
Being argumentative is a waste of time, but discussing things rationally, and thinking about what people say, is not. You could learn something.
It is possible that you are wrong about this you know. For some reason you guys want the truth of your assertions just accepted, and want to attack anyone that disagrees. Where does that arrogance come from?