This makes no sense. You are trying to use the fact that they made no distinction as proof that a distinction exists. They ruled he was a citizen at birth. They wouldn't have had to use some other term for the same thing.
Being argumentative is a waste of time, but discussing things rationally, and thinking about what people say, is not. You could learn something.
It is possible that you are wrong about this you know. For some reason you guys want the truth of your assertions just accepted, and want to attack anyone that disagrees. Where does that arrogance come from?
Who are you to ask?
They did not rule that Wong Kim Ark was a natural born citizen, and he wasn’t even running for president. What doesn’t make sense about that? For you to assert that because they ruled Wong was a citizen, therefore anyone born here is a natural born citizen, is what doesn’t make sense.
“It is possible that you are wrong about this you know. For some reason you guys want the truth of your assertions just accepted, and want to attack anyone that disagrees. Where does that arrogance come from? “
I would argue that applies to you, not me. I see no legitimate reason to change my position on natural born citizens, and your contradictory arguments are not at all convincing. I won’t apologize to you because you can’t figure it out, if that’s what you’re looking for from me.