So what?
You’re just looking for some line of personal attack I gather. Why not stick to the issue and defend Bush’s record if you disagree with the assertion that it is crappy.
I've posted to this arrogant, smug jackass enough to know that he doesn't deserve my respect. His age and his college status are relevant. He has no real-world experience. He lectures people three times his age on their party loyalty and their pragmatism. He's a punk. He disrespects George Bush with the cliches and trite slogans of the left. He voted third-party in the latest presidential election. He's an Obama enabler.
I offer him a fraction of the disrespect he offers any Republican Party loyalist.
He's not worthy of debate...he's worthy of insult. I'll continue along that line. Save your suggestions for an easier mark.
A lifetime's worth of "real-world experience" is worthless if it's spent betraying one's core beliefs, blindly following others, and whoring oneself out in the name of "pragmatism."
He disrespects George Bush with the cliches and trite slogans of the left.
Bush is part of the American establishment, a grouping that spans all political parties.
He voted third-party in the latest presidential election. He's an Obama enabler.
When have I directly aided and abetted Obama? Don't give me that Bushbot tripe about "you're either with us or against us"; such a naive and grossly oversimplified view of reality overlooks the possibility that I might be against both Democrats and Republicans, considering that they are both part of the American establishment and, will, in the interests of "pragmatism" and their own self-preservation, voluntarily and unhesitatingly throw me to the wolves in order to save themselves, as evidenced in the bailouts—pushed by both Republicans and Democrats— of the past fall.
Definitely relevant! That is, I'd say he's very bright if he understands so much without a lot of real-world experience!