Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Polish Community Shocked by Treatment of Polish Citizens at U.S. Border
New America Media ^ | Dec 30, 2008 | Ewa Kern-Jedrychowska

Posted on 01/01/2009 2:14:20 PM PST by lizol

Polish Community Shocked by Treatment of Polish Citizens at U.S. Border

Nowy Dziennik, News Report, Ewa Kern-Jedrychowska,

Posted: Dec 30, 2008 Review it on NewsTrust

Editor's note: The following excerpt is from Feetin2Worlds.org, where the entire commentary is posted. This story also appeared in Boston's ethnicnewz.org.

This year ends with an unpleasant intervention by Poland’s diplomatic staff at the U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Embassy in Warsaw. At issue are recent cases of Poles who were denied entry to the U.S. at the New York area airports.

While no one questions the right of the U.S to bar certain individuals from entering the country, the treatment of Polish citizens was shocking to many, especially since most of those stopped at the border were older women in their 60s and 70s. Many of them were coming to visit their families and friends for Christmas, but instead ended up being interrogated by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers and transported in handcuffs to a detention center.

“In my case, they told me I overstayed my visa (when I) worked here between 1989 and 1991,” said Mrs. Janina, 64, who asked not to reveal her last name. “I admitted it was true. But since then I was here again in 2004 after I obtained my new visa, and everything was fine. Why they are giving me troubles now because of something I did almost 20 years ago, I really don’t know?” Mrs Janina was one of 13 Poles, including 11 women, who were not admitted to the U.S. in the month of November at the Newark Liberty International Airport. Some Polish citizens were also stopped at JFK airport. Similar cases occurred in December.

While most of the time the reason for inadmissibility was an old immigration violation, there was also a 60-years old woman, Mrs. Anna, who said she had never overstayed her visa, but still was not admitted. Allegedly, she was told that her visits to the U.S. were too frequent. Her explanation that her son, daughter-in-law and grandchildren are U.S. citizens did not help.

CBP spokespeople are prohibited from discussing specific cases. They list, however, more than 60 grounds of inadmissibility divided into several major categories, including security reasons, illegal entrants and immigration violations, as well as documentation requirements.
Representatives of the U.S. Embassy in Warsaw stress that visas obtained in Poland do not guarantee that the visa-holder will be admitted to the U.S. The decision is up to CBP officers upon arrival to America.

After the interrogation Poles were ordered to return to their home country on the next available departure flight.

However, while waiting, their custody was transferred to Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers who transported them to a detention center in Elizabeth, New Jersey. During the ride officers put chains around their waists that were also connected with handcuffs. They also had chains put around their ankles. At the detention center they had to undress, and were given jail underwear as well as red uniforms, and were placed in cells. In some cases there were no beds and no blankets, only concrete benches and a toilet bowl. Some women claimed that they had no access to their medication, even though they suffered from various diseases. Mrs. Janina, who has heart disease and high blood pressure, maintains that she was one of them.

According to a note sent to the Polish Daily News after a meeting between representatives of the Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs with the U.S. consul general in Warsaw, Mr. Philip Min, these two issues – handcuffing and chaining of the elderly and lack of access to their medication - were the two main complaints that became the subject of the diplomatic conversation.

Women who complained to the Polish diplomatic services described their experience as traumatizing. “Before we left Elizabeth, they chained me again and then took me to the airport where other Poles waiting for the plane could see me. I felt as if I was the worst criminal. Prior to that I saw handcuffs and prison cells only in the movies,” said Mrs. Janina. She claims that after returning to Poland she ended up in the hospital, completely dehydrated and vomiting for hours.

Consul Wojciech Lukasiewicz of the Legal Affairs and Consular Protection Unit at the Polish consulate in New York claims that in the past he had seen cases of handcuffing Poles that were not admitted to the U.S.. “But I’ve never heard about so many cases in such a short period of time and I’ve never seen elderly women being handcuffed,” he said.

In a phone conversation with the Polish Daily News, ICE spokesperson Michael Gilhooly explained that “people are restrained when they are transported for security reasons; for the safety of the public, for the safety of officers and for the safety of other detainees.”

He also assured that all individuals coming from the airport to the detention facility get a medical screening. “They see a health care professional from the Immigration Health Services, and the medical personnel is on hand in that facility 24 hours a day.” The complete change of clothing, including undergarments, Gilhooly described as detention standards.

But the question many Poles are still trying to answer is ‘why now?‘ Has anything specific provoked this kind of reaction or is it just American immigration policy getting stricter? It’s highly improbable that this kind of treatment has a specifically anti-Polish character, since according to Polish diplomats in New York they’ve been receiving similar signals from other consulates. Regardless of the reason, Poles who consider themselves close allies of the United States, feel disappointed.

In recent years Poland proved to be one of the most pro-American countries in Europe. It has supported the wars in Iraq (Polish troops left Iraq in October 2008) and Afghanistan. In August 2008 Poland signed an agreement to install part of the U.S. missile defense system in its territory. It has been a NATO member since 1999.

As summarized in the note sent by the Polish Foreign Affairs Ministry, “Because of particularly close relationship between our countries and traditionally extremely positive attitude of Poles towards the U.S., these cases are highly sensitive for the image of the U.S. in Poland.”
This strict enforcement applied to Polish citizens is even more surprising, considering that with the economic situation in Poland greatly improved, the number of Poles immigrating permanently to the U.S. keeps decreasing. On the other hand, more are coming to travel, to shop, or for business, which could only help the American economy.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: allies; allypoland; bordersecurity; immigration; poland
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 01/01/2009 2:14:21 PM PST by lizol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: se99tp; AdvisorB; onedoug; AnalogReigns; The_Media_never_lie; dixiebelle; voteNRA; valkyry1; ...
Eastern European ping list


FRmail me to be added or removed from this Eastern European ping list

2 posted on 01/01/2009 2:16:03 PM PST by lizol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol

3 posted on 01/01/2009 2:17:48 PM PST by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol
The decision is up to CBP officers upon arrival to America

Fire every one of these Aholes and the people they work for. If anyone was really concerned about immigration, they would park these dumb fools on the southern border

4 posted on 01/01/2009 2:23:13 PM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget (July 4, 2009 see you there))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol

Will the CBP use the same standards for Muslim visitors?


5 posted on 01/01/2009 2:23:19 PM PST by 353FMG (The sky is not falling, yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol

Visiting too often? That’s just plain ridiculous.


6 posted on 01/01/2009 2:24:35 PM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol

If they came carrying a Koran and towing a Camel they would have been admitted immediately./sarc


7 posted on 01/01/2009 2:24:59 PM PST by Don Corleone (Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

Of course not.


8 posted on 01/01/2009 2:25:37 PM PST by Doctor Raoul (It's no longer the Press Van, it's a "Tanker" Truck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lizol
I have a feeling that the agents are being rated based on the number of violations they catch, and they are avoiding slamming people who may result in a CAIR protest. So they go for the safe arrests.

Something like how BATFE agents prefer arresting suburban middle class types on paperwork violations over raiding Crips hangouts looking for felons in possession.

9 posted on 01/01/2009 2:28:57 PM PST by PapaBear3625 (We used to institutionalize the insane. Now we elect them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol
“But I’ve never heard about so many cases in such a short period of time and I’ve never seen elderly women being handcuffed,” he said.

It’s Profiling

Somebody call the ACLU!

10 posted on 01/01/2009 2:30:52 PM PST by Pontiac (Your message here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol

There is no limit to how stupid government officials can be when they have unchecked power.


11 posted on 01/01/2009 2:32:11 PM PST by docbnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

I suspect you are exactly right. They go after the low hanging fruit rather than peruse the ones who pose the most danger to our country.


12 posted on 01/01/2009 2:33:45 PM PST by OCC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lizol

As 20 million Mexican stream in,, murdering, drinking, spreading eradicated diseases like Tuberculosis.


13 posted on 01/01/2009 2:37:12 PM PST by DesertRhino (Dogs earn the title of "man's best friend", Muslims hate dogs,,add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lizol

Wrong skin color, ladies. In America, you gotta be a shade or two darker before you get any rights or dignity from ICE.


14 posted on 01/01/2009 2:39:00 PM PST by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol

I can’t help to think that the reason why Poles are being chosen for separate treatment is that the bureaucrats in charge are being pressed into “doing something”, and singling out elderly Polish women is easy and low-risk. Gives them something to write down on their reports, and no follow up is needed, and if someone else more nefarious sneaks through in the mean time, they’re covering themselves as to what they were doing.

Same reason why octogenarian WWII vets get special security treatment at the nation’s airports by the clerks “looking for” terrorists.


15 posted on 01/01/2009 2:55:22 PM PST by I_Like_Spam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol

It makes me mad that the Feds are toughest on the least problematic people coming here yet allowing everyone else to come unchallenged through the open back door. It’s obvious that the plan is to change America into a completely different kind of society.


16 posted on 01/01/2009 2:57:18 PM PST by KittyKares (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol
And why do they not do the same for the Muslims and Mexicans???
17 posted on 01/01/2009 3:10:12 PM PST by YOUGOTIT (The Greatest Threat to our Security is the Royal 100 Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paul51
aways someone wanting exception for their favorite illegal. Threat them all the same, send them home. Case fixed.
18 posted on 01/01/2009 3:15:35 PM PST by org.whodat (Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts for Super-Rich Bankers! Republicans do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lizol
We can't let civilized people in to the US, they may in fact benefit the country.
We ssek out Islamic Somali's who don't even know how to flush a toilet to destow citizenship on.
19 posted on 01/01/2009 3:25:09 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

I think I know where you can get a job you appear to be well suited for


20 posted on 01/01/2009 3:33:23 PM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget (July 4, 2009 see you there))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson