To: SamAdams76
If you weren’t under the influence, then you shouldn’t have had an issue with the tests. You could have walked the line and passed the Breathalyzer.
50 posted on
12/31/2008 3:48:53 PM PST by
ConservativeMind
(What's "Price Gouging"? Should government force us to sell to the 15th highest bidder on eBay?)
To: ConservativeMind
The Breathalyzers give false readings; I guess you didn’t bother to read the article; that’s OK if you don’t bother to comment.
To: ConservativeMind
If you weren’t under the influence, then you shouldn’t have had an issue with the tests.If you are not hiding drugs in your house, you shouldn't have an issue with a warrantless search.
55 posted on
12/31/2008 3:52:59 PM PST by
CharacterCounts
(1984 was supposed to be a work of fiction, not a how-to manual.)
To: ConservativeMind
57 posted on
12/31/2008 3:53:49 PM PST by
buccaneer81
(Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
To: ConservativeMind; SamAdams76
If you weren’t under the influence, then you shouldn’t have had an issue with the tests. You could have walked the line and passed the Breathalyzer. You could at least read SamAdams's post before you replied to him...
103 posted on
12/31/2008 4:26:41 PM PST by
an amused spectator
(I am Joe, too - I'm talkin' to you, VBM: The Volkischer Beobachter Media)
To: ConservativeMind
If you weren’t under the influence, then you shouldn’t have had an issue with the tests. That is usually true enough.........but from personal experience this part of your comment is not always true:
You could have walked the line and passed the Breathalyzer.
I blew .05, without having consumed any alcohol at all. Granted that is not over the limit, but it is high enough to be detained or even arrested. IOW, those breathalyzers are not exactly stellarly accurate.
134 posted on
12/31/2008 5:02:01 PM PST by
Gabz
(Happy New Year)
To: ConservativeMind
You could have walked the line and passed the Breathalyzer.Nobody who gets to that point "passes" under current law.
To: ConservativeMind
If they can't convict you for driving under the influence of alcohol they will convict you for impairment instead..Even if you hadn't been drinking any alcohol
Didn't you know that in DUI cases reasonable doubt goes both ways!
Vig
621 posted on
01/02/2009 12:14:29 AM PST by
vigilante2
(I support global warming)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson