Posted on 12/31/2008 7:38:11 AM PST by presidio9
Deal triumphs over the patriarch of the 1980s government is the problem, according to a new Rasmussen poll.
By a margin of 45-40 with 15 percent undecided, poll respondents selected Franklin Delano Roosevelt as better than Ronald Reagan. Predictably, the two commanders-in-chief won high marks from those on their ideological spectrum, with 76 percent of liberals favoring Roosevelt and 68 percent of conservatives preferring Reagan.
But its with moderate, women and African-American voters where the poll gets interesting. Centrists back FDR over Reagan 56 percent to 26 percent, while black voters overwhelmingly support him by a 2-to-1 margin. Women favored Roosevelt by 15 percentage points.
As fewer voters align with a specific political school of thought and women and minorities become more politically engaged, future candidates could do well to emulate the big thinking of the New Deal, focusing on a collapsing economy and multiple foreign wars rather than political pandering and ideology.
It probably also doesnt hurt that the poll was conducted as Americans watched foreclosures loom, unemployment soar and Wall Street melt down. Maybe in the midst of an economic crisis, free markets without regulatory watch-dogging doesnt seem like such a great idea after all.
FDR: Decade long depression, world war, millions of people killed by facism and millions more killed or enslaved by Communism, rampant lynchings of blacks in the south.
Reagan: End of double digit inflation and unemployment rates, prosperity and growth, mostly peaceful except for an arms race which led to the collapse of the Soviet Union, national holiday for Martin Luther King, Jr.
Good grief! How stupid can people be?
Right, because Reagan had no collapsed economy to focus on, plus he had all those foreign wars going on. Instead we should pattern ourselves on Roosevelt, who had no foreign wars.
/unneccessary sarcasm tag
...rather than political pandering and ideology.
Also, per Liberal Fascism, fascism typically presents itself as non-ideological or post-ideological.
Bush gave conservatism a bad name. I can’t wait for 2010.
Are you kidding me? So 32 percent of conservatives prefer FDR?
Something stinks here.
They're painting with a broad brush. I'm sure they call McCain and GW conservatives (and both would probably raise their hands for FDR).
I agree with you. FDR presided over the most cataclysmic war of the last century. He is mentioned FAR more than Reagan and hence the familiarity. Throw in a flaming liberal media and there you have it.
And don't forget, forced imprisonment of innocent Japanese citizens.
FDR had a pro-Communist VP who saw Stalin’s gulags firsthand and said nothing.
Ronald Reagan helped bring about the collapse of the Soviet Union.
No comparison.
How utterly stupid this story is - the title makes it sound as though FDR has recently done something great to change Americans’ minds.
Whenever I find myself engaged in this sort of discussion, I am always suprised how quick Conservatives are to bring up Jefferson. His status as a president is mostly bolstered by his earlier work as a patriot, and writer of the DOI. His major accomplishment as president was the Louisiana Purchase. Monroe had to basically pin Jefferson to the floor for permission to speak to Napolean about the deal. Then, when the deal was completed, Jefferson immediately levied taxes against his new citizens who had never voted (ie: taxation without representation). This is not to say that Jefferson was a bad president (or even that you suggested he was a good one). Just that it ticks me off that he is always overrated on these lists. I'd rank Reagan above Jefferson.
FDR was a socialist who extended the Great Depression. He was a horrible President.
naaah
another poll skewed- so what else is new
For those of us in our 70’s, the pendulum swings far to slowly. We were counting on Bush to push the pendulum right a whole bunch more than he did.
Socialists do teach. They lay the groundwork in their worldview and restrict critical thinking. This way they induce people to accept their ideology
They also indoctrinate when those people are ready.
If conservatives taught history and logic, socialism would gain no traction. Now socialism, once a fringe, is almost the majority.
And what makes idiots that answer the phone capable of such a decision.
Undecided? BS. They didn’t know who Roosevelt was.
And on what grounds do they base their claim. How ‘bout you phrase the question: During their presidency who was better at the 50 yard dash?
You see...its all in the way the question is posed.
The world war was not FDR’s fault.
And in a related “poll”, respondents by a wide margin named Obama as the greatest President of the third Millennium....
You saw that November 4th,2008.
“This is because conservatives fail to teach.
Socialists have no such problem.”
I would use the word “indoctrinate” rather than “teach”.
I saw some Civil War movie off and on awhile back- Riding with the Devil or something, just saw bits and pieces. I think it was about Cantrells (sp?) Raiders which I think was after the war had ended??
ANYWAY - in one scene the younger guys with the Raiders are eating dinner with an older Southern Gentleman that is leaving the fight and moving to Texas. He tells the young raiders something like:
The Northerners built a school, and they teach the children what to think, and to think like them. Weve lost because we dont try to tell others how to think.
One young raider ready to lash out scowls You tryin to say what were fightin for aint worth it?
No - weve already lost what we are fighting for.
It went something like that anyway. A defeatist attitude I guess from the older gentleman, but accurate for the Civil War era. I hope it is not accurate for our times, but I fear it is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.