Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FDR knocks out Reagan as best 20th century president
The Colorado Independent ^ | 12/29/08 | Wendy Norris

Posted on 12/31/2008 7:38:11 AM PST by presidio9

Deal triumphs over the patriarch of the 1980s “government is the problem,” according to a new Rasmussen poll.

By a margin of 45-40 with 15 percent undecided, poll respondents selected Franklin Delano Roosevelt as better than Ronald Reagan. Predictably, the two commanders-in-chief won high marks from those on their ideological spectrum, with 76 percent of liberals favoring Roosevelt and 68 percent of conservatives preferring Reagan.

But it’s with moderate, women and African-American voters where the poll gets interesting. Centrists back FDR over Reagan 56 percent to 26 percent, while black voters overwhelmingly support him by a 2-to-1 margin. Women favored Roosevelt by 15 percentage points.

As fewer voters align with a specific political school of thought and women and minorities become more politically engaged, future candidates could do well to emulate the big thinking of the New Deal, focusing on a collapsing economy and multiple foreign wars rather than political pandering and ideology.

It probably also doesn’t hurt that the poll was conducted as Americans watched foreclosures loom, unemployment soar and Wall Street melt down. Maybe in the midst of an economic crisis, free markets without regulatory watch-dogging doesn’t seem like such a great idea after all.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Miscellaneous; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008polls; bravosierra; coldwar; fdr; hadacommievp; presidents; reagan; reddupe; starkravingsocialism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: presidio9
Let's see:

FDR: Decade long depression, world war, millions of people killed by facism and millions more killed or enslaved by Communism, rampant lynchings of blacks in the south.

Reagan: End of double digit inflation and unemployment rates, prosperity and growth, mostly peaceful except for an arms race which led to the collapse of the Soviet Union, national holiday for Martin Luther King, Jr.

Good grief! How stupid can people be?

21 posted on 12/31/2008 7:57:35 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or, are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
focusing on a collapsing economy and multiple foreign wars...

Right, because Reagan had no collapsed economy to focus on, plus he had all those foreign wars going on. Instead we should pattern ourselves on Roosevelt, who had no foreign wars.

/unneccessary sarcasm tag

...rather than political pandering and ideology.

Also, per Liberal Fascism, fascism typically presents itself as non-ideological or post-ideological.

22 posted on 12/31/2008 7:57:35 AM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Bush gave conservatism a bad name. I can’t wait for 2010.


23 posted on 12/31/2008 7:58:43 AM PST by SolidWood (Sarah Palin - Everything that is Sweetness and Light!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Flycatcher
68 percent of conservatives preferring Reagan.

Are you kidding me? So 32 percent of conservatives prefer FDR?

Something stinks here.

They're painting with a broad brush. I'm sure they call McCain and GW conservatives (and both would probably raise their hands for FDR).

24 posted on 12/31/2008 7:59:00 AM PST by randog (Hope is a bad business plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jeffc

I agree with you. FDR presided over the most cataclysmic war of the last century. He is mentioned FAR more than Reagan and hence the familiarity. Throw in a flaming liberal media and there you have it.


25 posted on 12/31/2008 7:59:05 AM PST by headstamp 2 (Been here before)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
FDR: Decade long depression, world war, millions of people killed by facism and millions more killed or enslaved by Communism, rampant lynchings of blacks in the south.

And don't forget, forced imprisonment of innocent Japanese citizens.

26 posted on 12/31/2008 8:00:27 AM PST by dfwgator (I hate Illinois Marxists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

FDR had a pro-Communist VP who saw Stalin’s gulags firsthand and said nothing.

Ronald Reagan helped bring about the collapse of the Soviet Union.

No comparison.


27 posted on 12/31/2008 8:02:36 AM PST by weegee ("Let Me Just Cut You Off, Because I Don't Want You To Waste Your Question" - B.Obama Dec 16, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

How utterly stupid this story is - the title makes it sound as though FDR has recently done something great to change Americans’ minds.


28 posted on 12/31/2008 8:18:10 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill
Harding and his successor Coolidge were also the last presidents to view themselves as chief magistrates, in the Jeffersonian tradition, with limited, enumerated powers. After 1928, the president essentially became an elected king.

Whenever I find myself engaged in this sort of discussion, I am always suprised how quick Conservatives are to bring up Jefferson. His status as a president is mostly bolstered by his earlier work as a patriot, and writer of the DOI. His major accomplishment as president was the Louisiana Purchase. Monroe had to basically pin Jefferson to the floor for permission to speak to Napolean about the deal. Then, when the deal was completed, Jefferson immediately levied taxes against his new citizens who had never voted (ie: taxation without representation). This is not to say that Jefferson was a bad president (or even that you suggested he was a good one). Just that it ticks me off that he is always overrated on these lists. I'd rank Reagan above Jefferson.

29 posted on 12/31/2008 8:20:25 AM PST by presidio9 (Islam Is As Islam Does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

FDR was a socialist who extended the Great Depression. He was a horrible President.


30 posted on 12/31/2008 8:24:36 AM PST by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
I'm surprised it wasn't Obama...I guess that will happen a couple of days after he's inaugurated.
31 posted on 12/31/2008 8:25:00 AM PST by HardStarboard ("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule - Mencken knew Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

naaah

another poll skewed- so what else is new


32 posted on 12/31/2008 8:25:28 AM PST by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

For those of us in our 70’s, the pendulum swings far to slowly. We were counting on Bush to push the pendulum right a whole bunch more than he did.


33 posted on 12/31/2008 8:27:21 AM PST by HardStarboard ("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule - Mencken knew Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky

Socialists do teach. They lay the groundwork in their worldview and restrict critical thinking. This way they induce people to accept their ideology

They also indoctrinate when those people are ready.

If conservatives taught history and logic, socialism would gain no traction. Now socialism, once a fringe, is almost the majority.


34 posted on 12/31/2008 8:28:56 AM PST by IrishCatholic (No local communist or socialist party chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

And what makes idiots that answer the phone capable of such a decision.

Undecided? BS. They didn’t know who Roosevelt was.

And on what grounds do they base their claim. How ‘bout you phrase the question: During their presidency who was better at the 50 yard dash?

You see...its all in the way the question is posed.


35 posted on 12/31/2008 9:19:56 AM PST by Vermont Lt (I am not from Vermont. I lived there for four years and that was enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

The world war was not FDR’s fault.


36 posted on 12/31/2008 9:23:32 AM PST by dbz77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

And in a related “poll”, respondents by a wide margin named Obama as the greatest President of the third Millennium....


37 posted on 12/31/2008 9:24:33 AM PST by mikrofon (Happy New Year 2009!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
Good grief! How stupid can people be?

You saw that November 4th,2008.

38 posted on 12/31/2008 9:29:22 AM PST by Centurion2000 (To protect and defend ... against all enemies, foreign and domestic .... by any means necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
This is not to say that Jefferson was a bad president (or even that you suggested he was a good one). Just that it ticks me off that he is always overrated on these lists. I'd rank Reagan above Jefferson.

It's difficult to know which of these men was truly a greater president (however you choose to define "greatness") when the institution of the Presidency was so drastically different in Jefferson's day than in Reagan's. I think that most conservatives would prefer the Jeffersonian institution to the imperial Presidency that Reagan inherited (and failed to inhibit).
39 posted on 12/31/2008 9:32:21 AM PST by UncleDick (Sola fide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: IrishCatholic

“This is because conservatives fail to teach.
Socialists have no such problem.”

I would use the word “indoctrinate” rather than “teach”.

I saw some Civil War movie off and on awhile back- “Riding with the Devil” or something, just saw bits and pieces. I think it was about Cantrell’s (sp?) Raiders which I think was after the war had ended??

ANYWAY - in one scene the younger guys with the Raiders are eating dinner with an older Southern Gentleman that is leaving the fight and moving to Texas. He tells the young raiders something like:

“The Northerners built a school, and they teach the children what to think, and to think like them. We’ve lost because we don’t try to tell others how to think.”

One young raider ready to lash out scowls “You tryin’ to say what we’re fightin’ for ain’t worth it?”

“No - we’ve already lost what we are fighting for.”

It went something like that anyway. A defeatist attitude I guess from the older gentleman, but accurate for the Civil War era. I hope it is not accurate for our times, but I fear it is.


40 posted on 12/31/2008 9:35:18 AM PST by 21twelve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson