Skip to comments.
Senator Theodore Bilbo (D-MS): The Last Senator Denied Credentials
Men for Palin Blog ^
| December 30, 2008
| W. T. Howes
Posted on 12/30/2008 6:25:39 PM PST by Charlie Fairbanks
overnor Blagojevich is at it again! He has defied his own party and appointed a successor to President-elect Barack H. Obama in the United States Senate. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) has already announces that the Senate would not seat the new nominee, which raised the question, when was the last time that the United States Senate refused to seat an elected Senator. According to U.S. Senate historians, the last time was in 1947, when a coalition of Republicans and Northern Democrats refused to seat Hon. Theodore Bilbo of Mississippi (pictured left). Senator Bilbo was a real character of the game. Lets turn back the clock and take a look at this little piece of historic irony.
(Excerpt) Read more at menforpalin.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; bilbo; blago; burris; corruption; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
What an irony! The last time the United States Senate refused to seat a legally elected or appointed Senator was in 1947, when the Republican-controlled body refused to seat arch-segregationist Senator Theodore G. Bilbo. Ironic? Sure. Senator Bilbo must be absolutely spinning in his grave with the knowledge that America has elected its first Black President. However, that old devil must also be chuckling because the man who is being blocked 62 years after he was blocked is Black. Theodore Bilbo was one of the most colorful Southern politicians of the twentieth century. He was one of a new breed of populists (or demoagogues, depending on your point of view) who rose up in the dirt poor deep South. Bilbo was always controversial. As a state senator he was involved in a bribery scandal connected to - ironically - the appointment of a new United States Senator. In the years before direct election of United States Senators, the Mississippi Legislature was set to select a new one. The multi-candidate field was deadlocked through several ballots in the legislature until several legislators changed their votes and resolved the race. The next day, Bilbo claimed to have been bribed by the victor. No one was ever charged or indicted or convicted in the scandal. However, Bilbo was impeached by the State Senate. He was not convicted. Despite the scandal, Bilbo was elected Lieutenant Governor of Mississippi. He served there, then as Governor and eventually a United States Senator. Bilbo was an avowed segregationist and an admitted member of the Ku Klux Klan (an honor he shares with his fellow Democrat, Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia). In the Senate, he sponsored bills providing appropriations for the relocation of African-Americans to West Africa. He penned a book entitled, Take Your Choice, Separation or Mongrelization, in which he explained the proposition. He publicly stated that he believed that Blacks should not vote. He filibustered an anti-lynching bill in the United States Senate. Bilbo was later eulogized as a redneck liberal for his shameless pandering to poor rural white folk and his support for the New Deal. He was such a figure that he has a namesake in William Faulkners fictional Yoknawpatawpha County - Bilbo Snopes. Theodore Bilbo died in 1947 of mouth cancer.
To: Charlie Fairbanks
some thoughts:
Formatting is nice.
I always say life is like a really bad movie, and that the line between fantasy and reality is being blurred by the media and entertainment industries (well, for that matter, and government too). Now we're starting to see people named after the characters.
To: fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Kuksool; Norman Bates; Impy; BillyBoy
This is ironic. Theodore Bilbo was perhaps the most loathsome demagogue ever to serve in the United States Senate. He disgraced every institution he ever served in. Wherever he is right now, I hope he got to watch the election this year. As much as I dislike Obama in the White House, it would be just deserts for Bilbo to see how discredited he is.
3
posted on
12/30/2008 6:29:03 PM PST
by
Clintonfatigued
(If greed is a virtue, than corporate socialism is conservative)
To: Charlie Fairbanks
4
posted on
12/30/2008 6:30:21 PM PST
by
montag813
(www.FreepShop.com)
To: Clintonfatigued
I Ted Kennedy was a Senator. I think murder out weighs any of the Mississippi Senators beliefs, which were the same as Byrd of WVA, he was just more public with his
To: Charlie Fairbanks
Well, they couldn't seat that other senator, not will all of Bilbo's baggage....
Karl Rove was on H&C before saying that Reid has no authority not to seat him. He'd have to expel him with a 2/3 vote. We shall see.
6
posted on
12/30/2008 6:36:32 PM PST
by
Tanniker Smith
(Teachers open the door. It's up to you to enter. Before the late bell. When I close the door.)
To: Tanniker Smith
I’m just giggling like a little girl over this.
7
posted on
12/30/2008 6:43:52 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
To: Tanniker Smith; montag813
My guess on this is that Senate Democrats are on their own on this. If Republicans are smart, they will stay out of this.
8
posted on
12/30/2008 6:47:56 PM PST
by
Clintonfatigued
(If greed is a virtue, than corporate socialism is conservative)
To: Tanniker Smith
Article V......"and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate"
Harry Reid is not bigger than the Constitution.
9
posted on
12/30/2008 6:49:03 PM PST
by
muawiyah
To: Tanniker Smith
Anyone that would believe or listen to that pasty little panty waist, Reid, has some head problems.
10
posted on
12/30/2008 6:53:18 PM PST
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote.)
To: muawiyah
That's what she said.
11
posted on
12/30/2008 6:53:29 PM PST
by
Ukiapah Heep
(Shoes for Industry!)
To: Clintonfatigued
If Reid wants a vote on whether to seat Burris, Republican Senators should follow the Messiah’s example - vote present.
12
posted on
12/30/2008 6:55:01 PM PST
by
yongin
(Converting people to Mormonism makes the world more conservative)
To: Charlie Fairbanks
Bilbo was a senator? Was that before or after he found the Ring?
13
posted on
12/30/2008 7:07:50 PM PST
by
Sherman Logan
(Everyone has a right to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.)
To: montag813
I just posted the answer to this question. If Harry Reid handled the matter correctly (a 50-50 shot). Burris will lose and will never be seated.
John / Billybob
To: muawiyah
Article V......"and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate" But see: Article I, Section 5, Clause 1:
Each House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members, ..."
The Supreme Court, in Barry v. United States ex rel. Cunningham, 279 U.S. 597, 615 (1929) held that refusal to permit a person presenting credentials in due form to take the oath of office does not deprive the State which elected such person of its equal suffrage in the Senate.
Dingy Harry Reid is on solid grounds.
15
posted on
12/30/2008 7:30:17 PM PST
by
Procyon
(To the global warming fanatics the problem is too many people and the solution is genocide.)
To: Procyon
He's still gotta' have a vote. The question posed is resolved with a 2/3 majority.
Harry imagines he can simply ignore Blago's nominee, but the Constitution does not support him on that.
16
posted on
12/30/2008 7:40:47 PM PST
by
muawiyah
To: muawiyah
Article V......"and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate" True, but of course, the Constitution is silent about the Democratic Party Caucus. They could refuse to make him a member of that caucus (this is what they threatened Lieberman with), but the effects on black America would be the very same as turning him away at the door.
The juicy part of this is yet to come, at some point, Barry will be asked to give a definitive opinion on this. He sided with letting Lieberman rejoin the Caucus, how can he turn his back on a brotha from his own state?!!
If he waffles on this, look for a return of the "he's not black enough" stuff that Oprah put to rest a year ago.
17
posted on
12/30/2008 7:55:53 PM PST
by
hunter112
(We seem to be on an excrement river in a Native American watercraft without a propulsion device.)
To: Clintonfatigued
“If Republicans are smart, ....”
Going by what I’ve read on Free Republic — that’s a big “If”.
To: Charlie Fairbanks
The Senate can refuse to seat a member if it s chooses. Like the House, it is the final arbiter of its own members.
19
posted on
12/30/2008 8:55:51 PM PST
by
TBP
To: muawiyah
Article V......"and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate" That was violated when the 17th amendment was passed. The entire section is dealing with amendments, the clause deals with non allowable amendments to the Constitution:
Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate
20
posted on
12/30/2008 9:46:12 PM PST
by
El Gato
("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson