Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Democrats' statement on Obama replacement
Townhall via AP ^ | Dec 30, 2008

Posted on 12/30/2008 1:26:45 PM PST by BAW

The text of the statement released Tuesday by the Democratic leadership in the Senate . . .

It is truly regrettable that despite warning from all 50 Democratic senators and public officials throughout Illinois, Gov. Blagojevich would take the imprudent step of appointing someone to the United States Senate who would serve under a shadow and be plagued by questions of impropriety. We say this without prejudice toward Roland Burris's ability, and we respect his years of public service. But this is not about Mr. Burris; it is about the integrity of a governor accused of attempting to sell this United States Senate seat. Under these circumstances, anyone appointed by Gov. Blagojevich cannot be an effective representative of the people of Illinois and, as we have said, will not be seated by the Democratic Caucus.

Next week we will start one of the most important debates of the year outlining an economic recovery plan to create jobs and invest in America. And in the coming weeks, we will be working to protect homeowners and consumers, make America more energy independent, strengthen our national security, and improve health care and educational opportunities. There is much work to do and a lot at stake. It is thus critical that Illinois and every other state have two seated senators without delay.

We again urge Gov. Blagojevich to not make this appointment. It is unfair to Mr. Burris, it is unfair to the people of Illinois and it will ultimately not stand. The governor must put the interests of the people of Illinois and all Americans first by stepping aside now and letting his successor appoint someone who we will seat.

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: 111th; blago; blagojevich; bleepgate; burris; obama; obamatransitionfile; reid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 12/30/2008 1:26:45 PM PST by BAW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BAW
will not be seated by the Democratic Caucus.

The Caucus, not the US Senate.

Burris is the next Senator from the State of IL, like it or not.

They'll deny him Committee seats, but that's about it.

He'll still vote with them.

L

2 posted on 12/30/2008 1:29:58 PM PST by Lurker ("America is at that awkward stage. " Claire Wolfe, call your office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BAW

Wow. I guess they really don’t want Burris. I can’t imagine they would actually hold up someone they WANTED to seat. They would still make sounds like they were dissappointed in the process, but would go ahead and seat the guy.

I wonder why Blagovich doesn’t simply declare himself “temporarily incapacitated”, and let the Lt. Governor appoint Burris.


3 posted on 12/30/2008 1:30:49 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BAW
A poison pill for Harry and his ilk. I love it!
4 posted on 12/30/2008 1:31:37 PM PST by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

No, they mean they won’t accept him, and since they are a majority, they will stop him from being a Senator.

The Senate has to accept each person who enters the senate. And they have the right under the constitution to NOT seat anybody they don’t want, although obviously if they abused that right the people would be expected to vote them out of office.

And no, I did not say that with a straight face. I tried, but I think that the modern american voting public would care LESS about abuses of power.


5 posted on 12/30/2008 1:32:40 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BAW

The Great One could end this today. A yay or nay from Obama would more or less settle it with the American people. He’s an incredibly eloquent man and, with the help of a teleprompter, could persuasively argue either way- for or against seating Burris. Unfortunately, the Great One has a major problem- he won’t take a stand.


6 posted on 12/30/2008 1:42:48 PM PST by Krankor (Vitajex, what ya doin' to me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
I wonder why Blagovich doesn’t simply declare himself “temporarily incapacitated”, and let the Lt. Governor appoint Burris.

Perhaps because Blagojevich has just called everybody's bluff.

The Governor of Illinois is legitimately empowered to appoint the replacement Senator. He has done so.

On what basis does;

a. The U.S. Senate reject Blago's appointment? They can actually do it, but how will they explain it?

b. The Illinois legislature impeach Blago? There is no hint of corruption associated with the appointment.

c. The U.S. prosecutor try him? Blago talked about corrupt practices...but he didn't actually exercise them.

Making the appointment needs to be interpreted as part of Blago's legal strategy.

7 posted on 12/30/2008 1:42:52 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
This statement is bullshit from the first word. It's what the dem caucus does. Blagojevich already stared them down and won. Now let them use their rules to disqualify Roland Burris, the only one on the list without the baggage, and with the cred. They'll be burning some important bridges if they try.

He'll still vote with them.

Depends on how they treat him.

8 posted on 12/30/2008 1:48:05 PM PST by Seven plus One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: okie01
The Illinois legislature impeach Blago? There is no hint of corruption associated with the appointment.

The IL GA can impeach him for bad breath. No criminality is required.

L

9 posted on 12/30/2008 1:49:33 PM PST by Lurker ("America is at that awkward stage. " Claire Wolfe, call your office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Seven plus One
He'll still vote with them.

Depends on how they treat him.

How did they treat Joe Lieberman?

10 posted on 12/30/2008 1:59:14 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
>> The IL GA can impeach him for bad breath. No criminality is required. <<

Technically true, but then they'd have to have a Senate trial and argue to the Illinois Senate that Blago is unfit to govern due to his bad breath and 2/3rds of the Senate should remove him for that reason.

They can impeach him on whatever they want, but they better have a pretty concrete case of wrongdoing to REMOVE him.

11 posted on 12/30/2008 2:01:06 PM PST by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
The IL GA can impeach him for bad breath. No criminality is required.

Of course, they can. But I don't think "bad breath" or "he's an asshole" is going to stand up in the court of public opinion.

Which is what politics is all about...

My contention is that Blago has just made it doubly difficult for his adversaries to do anything about him.

12 posted on 12/30/2008 2:05:35 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Wow. I guess they really don’t want Burris.

That is going to make the Rats REALLY popular with the IL blacks.

13 posted on 12/30/2008 2:06:12 PM PST by Navy Patriot (John McCain, the Manchurian Candidate, makes a Marxist President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BAW

Burris is a black Socialist from Chicago... That means he’s a saint, is gifted in a 1000 ways beyond mere peasant mortals, and has never done a single thing wrong.

Anyone who votes against him is a racist and is guilty of genocide. He WILL be seated.


14 posted on 12/30/2008 2:10:01 PM PST by navyguy (The National Reset Button is pushed with the trigger finger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
They can impeach him on whatever they want, but they better have a pretty concrete case of wrongdoing to REMOVE him.

Yes indeed. Even with a case it will also take a lot of time to do that. And every news agency will have a crew of reporters living there, copying everything. That's why they wish he'd just quit and let Pat 'The Doofus' Quinn take over. They just don't have the balls to back up all their talk.

15 posted on 12/30/2008 2:14:38 PM PST by Seven plus One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BAW
There is no way the Dems in the Senate are going to deny a black man a seat in the Senate. He will be the next Senator from Illinois. Guaranteed. He is obviously qualified.
16 posted on 12/30/2008 2:17:33 PM PST by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01
My contention is that Blago has just made it doubly difficult for his adversaries to do anything about him.

Absolutely so. I think he'll be able to bust through this with plain old brute force, the rest of the party will have to reluctantly go along since he's just doing his job. Without an indictment, they have no real ammo. "We refuse to seat Burris because we think the Governor is an asshole and should maybe be impeached" won't work here.

17 posted on 12/30/2008 2:31:28 PM PST by Seven plus One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Krankor
"Unfortunately, the Great One has a major problem- he won’t take a stand."

That's the impression I get also. He talks a lot but when it comes right down to it he won't make the difficult choices.

18 posted on 12/30/2008 3:48:50 PM PST by EEDUDE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BAW

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2156374/posts

Blagojevich Plays The Race Card On Fellow Democrats
Legal Insurrection Blog ^

Posted on Tuesday, December 30, 2008 2:28:09 PM by Legal Insurrection

Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich’s appointment of Roland Burris has put the Democratic party in a box. By appointing an African-American to the empty Senate seat, Blagojevich has forced his political opponents to risk being called racists. In supporting the appointment, Congressman Bobby Rush called opposition to Burris an attempted lynching. Whether this analogy is justified is questionable, but it is the same tactic that has been used against conservatives for decades, most recently by the Obama campaign. Democrats are getting a dose of their own medicine, and I hope it goes down like a bitter pill.


19 posted on 12/30/2008 3:57:52 PM PST by Grampa Dave (Does Zer0 have any friends, who are not criminals or foreign or domestic terrorists or both?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EEDUDE

Apparently, I was wrong.Obama allegedly backed up the Reid and said they shouldn’t seat Burris.


20 posted on 12/30/2008 4:04:57 PM PST by Krankor (Vitajex, what ya doin' to me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson