>>Men can do this. Most women can’t.<<
I know you know I was joking with my previous comment, but I do believe your comment is correct.
I look at it this way: A man can send 500 men into battle knowing full well that at least 50 will be killed. It is much more difficult for a woman to do this, which is just one of the reasons there are few female leaders in ground combat (tv and movie fiction notwithstanding). A country who’s troops are led by women is almost certain to be overrun by more agressive nations.
The lack of a maternal instinct has its strengths.
>>Men can do this. Most women can’t.<<
I know you know I was joking with my previous comment, but I do believe your comment is correct.
I look at it this way: A man can send 500 men into battle knowing full well that at least 50 will be killed. It is much more difficult for a woman to do this, which is just one of the reasons there are few female leaders in ground combat (tv and movie fiction notwithstanding). A country who’s troops are led by women is almost certain to be overrun by more agressive nations.
The lack of a maternal instinct has its strengths.
I wish I culd live with never look back. It would rid of much guilt.
These generalizations crack me up. Some women, women with issues, some men, men with issues, etc. Fortunately, most of us don’t have to deal with all these “issues” and just live our lives...and have great sex, which is a part of life.
You do a disservice to women by making statements that portray women as weak, which we all know isn’t the case. Weak women are weak, same as men. The rest of us deal and can’t be boxed into this little corner the psychologists and their patients would like to wrap around everyone for their own benefit.