Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bronxboy

so if you are poor and you can’t find a job you should lose your kids I guess. You will never convince me that is a conservative view.

Personally I prefer orphaneges. I think that they have much better oversight and are more cost effective. They provided a springboard for kids into the world.


79 posted on 12/29/2008 2:42:17 PM PST by Chickensoup (we owe HUSSEIN & Democrats the exact kind respect & loyalty that they showed us, Bush & Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Chickensoup

I know it is a stupid example, but did you ever see the “childhood” scenes in the Movie “Ray”? Nobody lost their kids even though they were dirt poor. The planet is designed to support life. If government would get out of the way, things would actually work pretty well.

I understand that in some parts of the country you need a permit to grow a garden.


82 posted on 12/29/2008 2:47:15 PM PST by RobRoy (Islam is a greater threat to the world today than Nazism was in the 1930's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson