Posted on 12/27/2008 2:45:07 PM PST by shove_it
Considering that it’s published in the UK, the Telegraph is a great American newspaper. Today, hosting Nile Gardiner on the vision and action of the much-reviled George Bush, champion of western values:
Much of the condemnation of his policies though is driven by a venomous hatred of Bush’s personality and leadership style, rather than an objective assessment of his achievements. Ten or twenty years from now, historians will view Bush’s actions on the world stage in a more favourable light. America’s 43rd president did after all directly liberate more people (over 60 million) from tyranny than any leader since Winston Churchill and Franklin D. Roosevelt.
[...]
(Excerpt) Read more at julescrittenden.com ...
Through his bailouts (not to mention his prescription drugs boondogle) George Bush is responsible for the greatest leap toward socialism since the New Deal. Liberator? Not by any objective standard for American rights and liberties! Good riddance to that socialist.
George W. Bush did the work that other American Presidents refused to do ....(Bush 41 *no finish the job* and Clinton *not enough Monica*)
The blow-dried MSM has no appreciation for the legacy of Churchill & FDR....too *last century*.
BTTT
BDS.
Liberate Agents Ramos and Compean and I will again admire GWB. Pardon time is drawing to an end.
Why are the numb so prevalent in journalism? Conservatives revile Carter even more now than ever before. The Left hates Reagan. The Left is still chasing NIxon. Clinton has the same supporters and detractors. What is this nonsense that history changes the public opinion of presidents?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.