Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal Way man dies after wife shoots in self-defense
Federal Way Mirror ^ | 14 December, 2008 | NA

Posted on 12/27/2008 5:31:14 AM PST by marktwain

The following information was taken from a Federal Way police news release:

At about 3:55 a.m. Dec. 13, Federal Way police responded to a shooting at the Mariposa Apartment Complex, 28120 18 Ave. S, Federal Way.

A 24-year-old white female called 911 to report she had shot her 40-year-old white male husband. Both are residents of Federal Way.

Upon arrival police contacted both subjects inside the apartment. The unresponsive male was on the bedroom floor with multiple gunshot wounds. South King County Fire

and Rescue responded along with paramedics from King County Medic One in an attempt to revive the male, but pronounced him dead at approximately 4:43 a.m. The King County Medical Examiner later responded and took control of the body.

Upon initial interview of the female, she stated she had been separated from her husband for several weeks and that they each had a protection order against the other. The female was later transported to St. Francis Hospital by ambulance for minor head injuries and related pain. After treatment, the female was transported to the Federal Way Police Department for interviewing and is cooperating with the investigation.

Preliminary investigation indicates the shooting was in self-defense. The scene was processed by the Federal Way Police Department with the assistance of the Washington State Patrol Crime Scene Team.

Federal Way police are currently following leads from witnesses and other involved

parties in an attempt to further investigate this incident.

The department encourages anyone who has any information regarding this

incident to call 911.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: banglist; domestic; lautenburg; washington
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
I wonder if the woman will be prosecuted for violating the Lautenburg amendment, which prohibits her from being in possession of firearms or ammunition while being under a protective order for domestic violence.
1 posted on 12/27/2008 5:31:15 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

“I wonder if the woman will be prosecuted for violating the Lautenburg amendment”

Thats just crazy talk.


2 posted on 12/27/2008 5:34:32 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

“A 24-year-old white female called 911 to report she had shot her 40-year-old white male husband.”

Why is the color of their epidermis important to this news story?

If a person is fleeing or is being sought, it is understandable to mention skin pigmentation. Otherwise it is silly and perpetuates race ‘distinction’.


3 posted on 12/27/2008 5:35:26 AM PST by mountaineer1997
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

It is a good question, crazy talk or not. You know the man would be charged. Some people are just more equal than others.


4 posted on 12/27/2008 5:37:58 AM PST by seemoAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

It is an EXCELLENT question! Why didn’t the “police” break down her dorr and confiscate her guns, thus saving this man’s life? His heirs, if any, should sue them.


5 posted on 12/27/2008 5:43:55 AM PST by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seemoAR

Those things are just another back door method at gun control. If some deranged man wants to kill his wife these laws mean little.


6 posted on 12/27/2008 5:44:54 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
“I wonder if the woman will be prosecuted for violating the Lautenburg amendment”

Excellent question, being the woman was shooter and both has restraining orders.

7 posted on 12/27/2008 5:46:52 AM PST by Popman (Dont worry Barney Frank has your ass-ets covered!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

So, all is fine if a deranged woman kills her husband. Nice world you live in.


8 posted on 12/27/2008 5:56:08 AM PST by seemoAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I presume it was her apartment, not his. If so, seems like a pretty simple case of self defense.


9 posted on 12/27/2008 6:03:11 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seemoAR

“So, all is fine if a deranged woman kills her husband. Nice world you live in.”

Where the heck did that come from? Read AND comprehend before sticking foot in mouth next time.

The laws making it illegal for a person under a restraining order to have a gun were created to protect women from angry husbands. That is how they were sold and how they are enforced. They have little impact which I suspect is due to the fact that if a person is willing to commit murder then illegal possession of a firearm means little.


10 posted on 12/27/2008 6:05:55 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer1997
“Why is the color of their epidermis important to this news story?”

It is hard to be sure, but probably a result of racism. Pigmentation is almost never mentioned if the perpetrator is not white. Anti-white racism is the only type acceptable in the media. I hope that this is changing. I was pleasantly surprised when many in the MSM said that Pastor Wright's comments against whites were racist.
11 posted on 12/27/2008 6:06:23 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

I apologize if I was wrong. You are correct, that law wasn’t passed to protect the man. We have to live by the laws that are on the books. The man is dead. He would have been in deep trouble if he had used a gun in self defense. The woman won’t be.


12 posted on 12/27/2008 6:39:18 AM PST by seemoAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: seemoAR
“I apologize if I was wrong. You are correct, that law wasn’t passed to protect the man. We have to live by the laws that are on the books. The man is dead. He would have been in deep trouble if he had used a gun in self defense. The woman won’t be.”

Laws often have unintended consequences. I understand that in California, activist feminists were horrified that so many women were being convicted of domestic violence, that they had the law changed to require that an investigation into who had initiated the violence be done before the person was arrested.

As a result, far more women were arrested for domestic violence than before. It is very hard to make good decisions when your basic premises are false.

13 posted on 12/27/2008 7:50:45 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Interesting.


14 posted on 12/27/2008 7:58:22 AM PST by patton (+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: seemoAR
It is a good question, crazy talk or not. You know the man would be charged. Some people are just more equal than others.

If you're going to talk inequality, then at least acknowledge inequality of threat. A husband can also have just cause to shoot his wife, all he has to show is that she was an immediate threat and he was in fear of his life. Unless both are armed, he's often going to have a hard time showing that. The "inequality" you speak of is not an unfairness, it's reality.

15 posted on 12/27/2008 7:59:54 AM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer1997
Why is the color of their epidermis important to this news story?

Man bites dog? :o)

16 posted on 12/27/2008 8:00:53 AM PST by InABunkerUnderSF (Illegal Immigration is not about the immigration. Gun control is not about the guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

The moral of the story is; Don’t bring a knife to a gun fight.


17 posted on 12/27/2008 8:41:16 AM PST by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer1997

“Why is the color of their epidermis important to this news story?”

I agree. Very strange. Only thing I could think of is that the tenants at this apartment complex are mostly people of color trash.


18 posted on 12/27/2008 9:45:01 AM PST by shaft29 (Just your typical black woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: InABunkerUnderSF

“Why is the color of their epidermis important to this news story?”


The PC police with get you for that! ;-)


19 posted on 12/27/2008 12:04:24 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog; seemoAR
HairOfTheDog posted:
“The “inequality” you speak of is not an unfairness, it's reality.”

marktwain replied:
Nice to run into you on the forum again. It sounds as if you and seemoAR are posting past each other. I thought he was talking about legal inequality, and you are talking about physical inequality.

Am I correct?

20 posted on 12/27/2008 12:08:15 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson