Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RGSpincich
No order from the court denying the father contact with his children was in effect. The mother and her family took it upon themselves to make that happen.

It says in the link you provided:

Boudreaux and his estranged wife had been going through mediation to resolve their custody dispute, which fell through, Whittle said..... Visitation papers had not been signed by a judge

It also says in the article that the mother let the paternal grandmother come and visit but when she tried to invite the father he "got ugly".

Let me know where my logic fails:

If old Nitzy wanted to come to YOUR house to take YOUR children home with me I should be able to because there is no court order preventing me. Further more you would be wrong for using force to stop me.

44 posted on 12/27/2008 6:41:25 AM PST by nitzy (I live in constant fear of the day I stop being optimistic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: nitzy
If old Nitzy wanted to come to YOUR house to take YOUR children home with me I should be able to because there is no court order preventing me.

Is old Nitzy named on my children's birth certificates? If so, WE need to talk about support, Nitz.

49 posted on 12/27/2008 6:46:58 AM PST by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: nitzy

If there was no agreement then that means that the father had just as much right to his children as the mother. They were HIS kids too.


147 posted on 12/27/2008 11:27:54 AM PST by tiki (True Christians will not deliberately slander or misrepresent others or their beliefs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson