Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's Infrastructure Impotency
Cowboy Confessional ^ | 12-26/2008 | Guy Smith

Posted on 12/26/2008 6:37:58 AM PST by guyshomenet

Like an aging porn star, Obama’s infrastructure-focused economic stimulus scheme fails to rise to the occasion.

...

Obama seeks to impassion the economy by (re)building infrastructure such as parkways to patrons, bridges to backers and damns to donors. It is Obama’s reliance on specific political cells in the American economic ecosystem that will doom the States to a prolonged recession while reinforcing Obama’s infrastructure — his political base — for the next two campaign cycles.

Three vectors sweetly summarize people who collectively comprise the economy including all those Obama purposefully leaves behind. First, people are spread across geography from coast to coast and border to border ... Big cities backed Obama and now rural taxpayer-financed infrastructure projects will back big cities. Think of this program as both a payoff and a down payment to his core voters. People in small towns, rural regions and even the suburb-bound middle class don’t get their money shot.

...

Envision the economic cube above with only a dozen cells lit. That is Obama’s economic vision, one that leaves nearly everyone in an economic drainage ditch. Big city unionized workers and their bosses however will do quite well and have excess campaign donations come 2010 and 2012.

...

But during the campaign Obama said his mission was to make “government cool again” (which it never was). Relying on the people to keep and make the best use of their own money cuts government out of the equation.

(Excerpt) Read more at guysmith.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: 111th; agenda; bho2008; bhostimulus; economics; impotency; infrastructure; obama; obamatransitionfile; stimulus

1 posted on 12/26/2008 6:37:58 AM PST by guyshomenet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: guyshomenet
Obama said his mission was to make “government cool again”

Government is all about 'force'. That's why it needs to be small. A phrase such as 'government intrusion' is actually redundant.

2 posted on 12/26/2008 6:42:22 AM PST by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: guyshomenet

This nails it. He has many to payback and his social engineering will “benefit” those. All this to secure his second term. And, sadly, the American electorate will give him that second term.


3 posted on 12/26/2008 6:43:33 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tbpiper

Plus, when was government ever cool? 1789?


4 posted on 12/26/2008 6:44:36 AM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tbpiper

Exactly. I was reading something from Mises a couple of weeks ago- something like ‘government is the only societal institution to which we grant a monopoly on the use of force.’

Most people never think about it in those terms. especially if they’re getting a government check.


5 posted on 12/26/2008 6:45:00 AM PST by ovrtaxt (It is better for civilization to be going down the drain than to be coming up it. ~Henry Allen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: guyshomenet

‘aging porn star’ lol


6 posted on 12/26/2008 6:45:35 AM PST by ovrtaxt (It is better for civilization to be going down the drain than to be coming up it. ~Henry Allen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: guyshomenet

FDR made the same mistake and WORSENED the Depression. Washington never learns


7 posted on 12/26/2008 6:49:12 AM PST by hamburglar (The result of spreading the wealth around is spreading unemployment around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

If there were more than one, then it would not be a monopoly. However, Von Mises point is well taken. THAT is exactly why the Founding Fathers gave us the 2nd Amendment - to counterbalance the power of the Fed.gov .


8 posted on 12/26/2008 6:51:31 AM PST by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: guyshomenet

For Hussein to get any locally designed and on the shelf ready to bid infrastructure projects to construction a la stimulus funding, he will have to waive NEPA regulations/procedures. Lots of luck with the greenie weenies!!

From my 36 years being a Civil Engineer in the business,most construction projects funded by the Feds take 3-4 years to navigate through the envir-nut bureaucracy. Additionally Infrastructure spending has never been popular with politicians because bridges and roads are less reliable democRAT voters than welfare check recipients! 

I think that all this infrastructure spending is like everything else coming out of Washington, DC just so much BS.


9 posted on 12/26/2008 8:19:35 AM PST by texican01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: guyshomenet

This could be compared to Mussolini’s contribution to society. “The trains ran on time”.


10 posted on 12/26/2008 8:29:49 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson