Not that they can think that far outside the box, however....
They’re not stupid enough to strike before Jan 20, are they?
Don’t worry - 0bama will talk with them...
Like what? someone breathing?
They’ll try to get a wholesale deal from Obama first. This is the mullahs chance, which they won’t squander right away.
I hope they don’t, but if they are that dumb, they will find out what we really think of muzzlums, albeit, too late for them. muHAMed will run out of virgins quickly.
this means it either originated from the enemy or it will help him.
No way!
Not when we have infrastructure repair, economic rejuvenating, and political healing to take care of first.
The Messiah in coming has priorities.
Purge or be Purged.
islamicfinder dot org
I’d be surprised if Hezbollah staged an attack in the US, or, for that matter upon Americans or US interests abroad. Not that they’re not nasty enough; they are, but they have a solid hierarchy, discipline, and the desire to survive as a group. They want to remain credible in Lebanon as a whole, and for Lebanon to develop economically. Nasrallah himself stated that if Hezbollah had anticipated the scale of the Israeli response in their latest war, they would not have launched the cross-border attack that precipitated it. And how much more devastating a response would Hezbollah expect from the US response?
“The terrorism threat to the United States over the next five years will be driven by instability in the Middle East and Africa ...”
Well .. I believe our greatest danger will be THE PERCEPTION of weakness by our enemies, which will have been created by the Obama administration’s actions (ala the Clinton administration’s actions).
There’s a “sealth jihad” right here in America .. but the media doesn’t care to see it or know about it .. and therefore it doesn’t exist. A biological hit on NYC or Wash DC doesn’t fit their agenda.
old news. This is something that both Israel and the US would have to take into account if we were to strike Ira,
(1)If the Chertoff report was supposedly "for official use only," how did the AP get its hands on it? (My first guess is that it was leaked by some Democrat in Congress.)
(2)Someone is making a point that the more a specific type of immigration is restricted by law, the more illegal immigration of that type will occur. The implication is that legal restriction on immigration is useless. Is this Chertoff or the AP writers making such an inane comment?
(3)No mention of what the policies of the incoming "Osama" Obama administration might mean for homeland security. Why?
Hizbullah may strike the US?
The question is not may, but where and how soon.