[Eric in the Ozarks]

Lets have the NYT publish its so called “standards” so the rest of us can measure up, eh ?

[pabianice]

PEOPLE NOTICE!

[Ukiapah Heep]

What about the rest of the paper?

[ronnyquest]

The phrase “The New York Times” must never be used in the presence of the words “standards” or “integrity.”

[steelyourfaith]

Do duh name Jayson Blair ring a bell ?
h/t to Amos 'n' Andy

[Vaduz]

Times was duped by some scoundrel should read
scoundrel duped by the Times

[Oldpuppymax]

So a newspaper with no interest in facts finds its circulation declining? Why, it must be the fault of advertisers!

[MarineBrat]

NYT is a Communist Kamikaze.

[Navy Patriot]

Doing so violated both our standards and our procedures in publishing signed letters from our readers.

Hummmm, must be new standards, as I was aware that the NY Slime published all fake, all the time.

Then again, it probably is new, because it would be easy to vet their readers, I can count them with my shoes on.

[jeffc]

Instead, it laid total blame on the Bush administration -- poor old George, in particular.

But when the RATS can't get away with not being blamed, they cry, "At least we are trying to do something about it!" (whatever the crisis du jour is . . . ).
Hard to believe the NYT would publish something detrimental to Caroline, unless it was a setup. I mean, come on, they didn't check to see if the mayor of Paris really wrote it? SNORT! Now that's integrity for ya!

[Redbob]

They should have known immediately it was a fake; how could the Mayor of Paris EVER be critical of a Kennedy???

</sarc>