Posted on 12/21/2008 7:18:54 PM PST by Mike Bates
Of course Elian would be well taken care of. He’s an important propaganda tool!
“Gonzalez ‘Has Been Well Taken Care of By Fidel Castro’”
And Russia took very good care of Lee Harvey Oswald before he returned to kill JFK.
Meaningless....
Not if his intent were to abuse Elian. Dragging his son back to live in the subhuman environment of Castro's Cuba was, imho, a form of child abuse.
Simple. Because no Cuban parent HAS custody of their child. They are the PROPERTY of the state. Elian was returned to his owner, Fidel Castro.
Papa was ordered by Fidel to “claim” Elian, and his failure to do so would’ve resulted in an extremely stiff penalty to his other relatives. You can guess what that would be.
And what conditions would he be living under if Castro didn’t need to make his life easy in case the world asks “Can you give us an update on Elian Gonzalez”?
“Not if his intent were to abuse Elian. Dragging his son back to live in the subhuman environment of Castro’s Cuba was, imho, a form of child abuse.”
So what we need is the U.S. government deciding this? Yeah, that’s a conservative idea.
What entity would you prefer, the UN?
I object because it contravened the existing US laws and regulations concerning Cuban refugees. When Elian’s mother died the US family courts gave custody to his uncle and relatives here. They were pursuing the situation through Family court in Florida and the case had not yet exhausted all avenues.
The Clinton regime and Janet Reno’s thugs weren’t satisfied with legal means. So, they took the law into their own hands, and with the abuse of their authority kidnapped Elian and sent him back into Cuban slavery.
Ping
IIRC, you joined FR when this outrage occurred.
Elian’s mother died freeing him from a slave state. The US government decided that she should have died in vain.
There was no problem releasing him to his Father. The problem was sending him back to Cuba.
**While I do not like his politics, he does have a legal right to his child.**
In Cuba, Parents have custody of their children... as long as they do not teach the children anything that CONFLICTS with the STATE. All Children are basically Property of the STATE. THAT is why we spoke out AGAINST RETURNING Elian to Cuba.
which is also the same as the “Universal rights of the Child” from our beloved COMRADES at the UN.
So Fidel has taken good care of him. But gee I thought the whole point was that he should go back to Cuba so “he could be with his father.” That’s what all the lefties and air-headed RINO’s told me. Hmmmm.
Since it’s Christmas, I’ll add that he was returned to a country where it is illegal to teach him about Jesus.
Whatever else they may give him by way of material goods (and that’s not much) won’t make up for what they fail to give him.
The US government did decide this. And it appears that the decision makers are prospering in their careers. One of them gets to be our new attorney general, in fact. The quality of their 'idea' is for you to judge.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.