Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hardastarboard
Oh, stop it. Trent Lott is hardly to blame. When the head of the Senate Democrats came to him and said that no matter what witnesses he called or what evidence he produced THEY WERE VOTING "NO", he shut it down and called for the vote. The press was killing them, they lost seats in the '98 election and the country had turned against removal.

He did what anyone would have done in his place. The ignorance on this subject is exhausting.

27 posted on 12/19/2008 10:02:20 AM PST by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Deb

While I understand your frustration with this topic, I’d like to note something for you to consider.

The press killed them (Republicans) anyway.

Lott didn’t prevent anything. He did however demonstrate that a human can in fact survive without a spine.

The Senate should have held complete hearings, admitted all testimony and available evidence, once the House voted to Impeach.

In hindsight, the House screwed up big time.

But that doesn’t change the fact Trent Lott failed in his Consitutional duties in this matter.


28 posted on 12/19/2008 10:05:11 AM PST by Badeye (There are no 'great moments' in Moderate Political History. Only losses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Deb
He did what anyone would have done in his place.

Exactly. He showed no leadership whatsoever - all through his tenure as Senate majority leader.

29 posted on 12/19/2008 10:11:30 AM PST by Hardastarboard (Why do I find the Toyota "Saved by Zero" ads so ironic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson