Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy plans to bring nuclear carrier to Mayport [USS George H.W. Bush (CVN-77)]
The Florida Times-Union ^ | November 19, 2008 | Timothy J. Gibbons

Posted on 12/18/2008 3:52:10 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Thousands more sailors will call Mayport home come 2014, when the Navy moves a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier to its base there.

The Navy will spend the next five years and some $400 million dredging the St. Johns River, refurbishing the wharf and building infrastructure to handle the ship, which will partially fill the void left when the John F. Kennedy was decommissioned in 2007.

As well as providing a half-billion-dollar ongoing economic impact, the decision to base a carrier at Mayport Naval Station showcases the area's strategic potential, local politicians said after the announcement Monday, and cements Jacksonville's place in the Navy's plans for the future.

Although the Navy brass doesn't officially sign off on the recommendation for at least 35 days, U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., said the decision is a "done deal."

"It's the first step in a long process of redoing the facilities in Mayport," he said.

Having the ship here "reduces risk to fleet resources in the event of a natural disaster, manmade calamity, or attack by foreign nations or terrorists," the Navy said in announcing the decision, which will be officially released Friday.

That argument is one Florida politicians have pushed for years: All four aircraft carriers on the East Coast are based in Norfolk, they say, opening the door for a Pearl Harbor scenario if the Virginia base were attacked.

(Excerpt) Read more at jacksonville.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: Florida; US: Virginia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 111th; bush; congress; economy; navalair; navy; obama; spending; ussgeorgehwbush
Why would we put all our eggs in one basket (Norfolk)?
1 posted on 12/18/2008 3:52:10 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Having a carrier based in the Gulf of Mexico also sends a nice warning to Msrs. Castro and Chavez.


2 posted on 12/18/2008 3:53:38 PM PST by MahatmaGandu (Remember, remember, the twenty-sixth of November.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Politics. It's about who has the clout.

That was proven to me when in 1991, the closest USAF SAC base in the lower 48 to the then-USSR (Loring AFB) was closed.

Why? Because it was in far northern Maine. No congressional clout, national security be damned.

3 posted on 12/18/2008 3:56:07 PM PST by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MahatmaGandu
Having a carrier based in the Gulf of Mexico

Mayport=Jacksonville. Hardly a Gulf base. Eight-ten hours minimum for a carrier group to get to the Keys.

4 posted on 12/18/2008 3:58:49 PM PST by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I thought the GW was supposed to be based permanently in Japan.


5 posted on 12/18/2008 4:03:46 PM PST by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp
I thought the GW was supposed to be based permanently in Japan.

I got a feeling our presence in the Pacific is going to start dwindling.
6 posted on 12/18/2008 4:06:27 PM PST by randomhero97 ("First you want to kill me, now you want to kiss me. Blow!" - Ash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp
I thought the GW was supposed to be based permanently in Japan.

GW is based in Japan. GW = USS George Washington, CVN-73.

7 posted on 12/18/2008 4:08:23 PM PST by Al B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: randomhero97

Hardly.
Largest concentration of military in the world is in San Diego and building up more.


8 posted on 12/18/2008 4:09:27 PM PST by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin - Jindal 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol

Stateside, yes. I am referring to the Southeast Asia Pacific region. I don’t know, though, just articles and publications that I have read due to the incoming administration. Basically, the DoD will expect a force restructure and cuts. Could all just be speculation. The talking heads probably know as much as we do.


9 posted on 12/18/2008 4:13:08 PM PST by randomhero97 ("First you want to kill me, now you want to kiss me. Blow!" - Ash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

If they wanted to put a carrier anywhere closer they’d have to build shore facilities from scratch. Mayport already has the facilities for a carrier, they just need to be upgraded.


10 posted on 12/18/2008 4:21:44 PM PST by Mountain Troll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

That’s a big deal. Mayport hasn’t been the same since they decomissioned all of the conventional carriers. I think the last flat-top to call Mayport home was USS Saratoga CV-60...

“Suckin’ Sixty from Dixie” was her nickname for a while because she got caught in the mud pier side one year when a hurricane pulled all the water out of the bay, and left Sara sitting stuck in the mud and sucking a bunch of it up through her uptakes...

CAFSU (Carrier and Field Service Unit) or (Come Aboard, F**k Sumpthin’ Up) used to have quite a good Field Office near the pier in Mayport, and they did a ton of work on any carrier that pulled in down there. I would expect they will be doing a Land-Office business with a nuke boat home-ported there.


11 posted on 12/18/2008 4:32:25 PM PST by Bean Counter (Stout Hearts.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mountain Troll
Mayport already has the facilities for a carrier, they just need to be upgraded.

Oh, I know. JFK and Enterprise used to be homeported there.

12 posted on 12/18/2008 4:41:36 PM PST by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bean Counter; cardinal4

The only U.S. aircraft carrier I’ve ever seen was the USS Saratoga. She was tied up off Naples back in 1963. Even from the Fleet Landing, it was an awesome sight,


13 posted on 12/18/2008 5:48:12 PM PST by Ax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81; MahatmaGandu

Mayport is the home of the recently-revived Fourth Fleet, IIRC.


14 posted on 12/18/2008 6:06:05 PM PST by Charles Martel (Liberals are the crab grass in the lawn of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81
.


You DON'T want a Aircraft naval facilty any closer to Cuba-Venezula ... than Jacksonville ...

Too tempting a target for a first strike ...

In Jacksonville ... Enemy fighters-bombers cruise missiles are picked-up (and defeated) way before they'd hit the carrier ..



15 posted on 12/18/2008 10:09:21 PM PST by Patton@Bastogne (Angels and Ministers of Grace, Defend Us ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Patton@Bastogne

Good point.


16 posted on 12/18/2008 10:33:56 PM PST by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson